A Fresh Volley

My friends at Trans Media Watch should be back in front of the Leveson Inquiry on media ethics soon with a new submission. As I have noted over the past few days, ever since TMW first gave evidence, the tabloid press has ramped up its campaign of harassment against trans people. As Pink News reports, in the fortnight since the Leveson appearance, 34 articles on trans people have been published in the British press, 14 of them in the Daily Malice and its subsidiaries. They are almost entirely hostile (using terms like “freakish” and “revolting”). Some follow the practice of presenting an article as an interview when in fact they just stole quotes from other online sources. And some are almost laughably inaccurate. According to one Malice article, trans people didn’t exist 20 years ago. Well it is good to know that I can’t be any older than 20.

A rather better account of trans history, in this case black trans history, can be found in this fine article by Monica Roberts in Ebony. The first known African American trans person was born in 1886.

Meanwhile the Huffington Post has asked someone who actually works with trans kids to counter some of the lies and distortions being spread by the tabloids. It is an excellent piece, and in particular shows clearly how, under the excuse of providing “balance”, the media privilege the views of people with loud opinions but no actual knowledge above those who work in the area in question.

Dispatches

The Daily Malice article that I mentioned on Monday did manage to finger one organization that does good work on behalf of trans people. That was GIRES (the Gender Identity Research and Education Society). It is a registered charity, and a quick browse of the website will show you just how valuable it is. The Malice thinks it is a waste of taxpayers’ money. But how much of a waste?

Well, just about everyone in the UK who can’t afford expensive accountants and offshore tax havens is a taxpayer. Even kids may pay some VAT out of their pocket money. But to give the Malice a fair chance I’m going assume that by “taxpayer” they mean individuals who pay things like income tax. (That accounts for some 55% of tax revenue.) There are currently around 29.9 million such people in the UK. That means that on average each UK taxpayer “wastes” 0.12 pence every year on GIRES. Outrageous, eh?

Meanwhile ITV has been getting in on the act. I’ve blogged before about 10-year-old Livvy James when she appeared on the BBC’s breakfast show. The BBC invited my pal Paris Lees from Trans Media Watch to be the resident expert that day. Not to be out done, ITV decided to ask Livvy on their show too. And for their resident “expert” on trans issues they invited Anne Atkins, someone so homophobic that even the Press Complaints Commission was moved to censure her. Atkins is also a leading figure behind True Freedom Trust, an organization that promotes “reparative therapy” (i.e. torturing people until they agree to behave they way that you want them to) for LGBT people.

As I said to someone on Twitter, at least Paddy Power only targeted adults. It takes a special kind of scum to bring in a notorious professional hate-monger to try to bully and humiliate a 10-year-old girl. Stay classy, ITV.

Finally, a bit of health news. As most of you probably know, the current medical thinking is that transition to the preferred gender is by far the best way to treat transsexuals. Post-transition, the only medical intervention they should need is regular supplies of hormones, and occasional blood tests to make sure the dosage is correct. There’s an issue here with testosterone because of the danger of mis-use by athletes, but oestrogen is regularly prescribed by GPs for contraception and HRT. Trans women ought to be able to get it easily.

What’s more, synthetic oestrogen is cheap. The NHS has a minimum prescription charge that most patients have to pay, and they make a profit on any oestrogen that they supply.

Yesterday Nottingham Primary Care Trust put all medication for trans people, pre- or post-op, on their “red list”, meaning that it can only be prescribed under the instructions of a qualified specialist. While many GPs do still refuse to treat trans people, this is a significant departure for an NHS management body, and it is probably illegal. It is also expensive, because now all trans people in the Nottingham area will have to go to a specialist gender clinic to get their regular prescriptions. It is, in fact, a dreadful waste of taxpayers’ money.

But, as we have seen, tabloid newspapers are not very good at sums. They can’t work out what is a waste of money and what isn’t. All they care about is whether or not people they hate are getting treated on the NHS. And all that Nottingham PCT appears to care about is not appearing in a newspaper article being accused of wasting taxpayers’ money by treating trans people. So they have passed the buck. Our newspapers, it seems, are able to set health policy regarding who gets treated and who does not. As a taxpayer, I do not like this idea.

The Truth About The Gender Industry

Yesterday’s Daily Malice contained a lengthy article purporting to expose the evils of Britain’s “Gender Industry”. Unfortunately, as is common for the Malice, their journalists knew very little about the subject and got much of it wrong. In particular they fingered the Portman and Tavistock Clinics as leaders of this industry, when in trans communities this organization is known as deeply conservative and often acting in ways directly opposed to the interests of trans people. For an example, in 2002 a group of their staff wrote to the Daily Telegraph as follows:

The recent judgment in the European Court of Human Rights, in which a post-operative transsexual person was granted permission to marry in his adopted gender role, is a victory of fantasy over reality.

If there is someone that these people deem worthy of treatment, you can bet that the case is very clear cut.

The reality of care for trans people is very different. There are probably a few surgeons who make good money, though I’m guessing less than they could get in more glamorous specializations. Organizations that care for trans people are often heavily dependent on charity, which in turn relies on actual trans people for donations, and they are chronically underemployed. Medical professionals are constantly at risk of being hit with malpractice suits from conservative colleagues should they be deemed guilty of treating trans people with compassion and respect.

Of course the British people, and indeed concerned persons all around the world, do need to know more about this clandestine and hugely profitable gender industry. I have therefore taken it upon myself to indulge in a little investigative journalism. Here is the awful truth of how cunning trans people have made fortunes by replacing “real” men and women with “fakes” in work that does not conform to traditional gender stereotypes.

One of the first gender entrepreneurs in the UK was Roz Kaveney. A struggling journalist and aspiring writer, Kaveney was introduced by her friend, Neil Gaiman, to an equally ambitious American screenwriter called Joss Whedon. Whedon had a plan to create a TV series based around the cult movie, Buffy the Vampire Slayer. However, he was unable to persuade any Hollywood actresses to star in the series. They felt that taking the role of a kick-ass, vampire-killing heroine would be damaging to their public images, and to their long-term careers. Whedon therefore asked Kaveney to supply a group of trans women to act in the series.

When Buffy became a surprise hit, Kaveney was suddenly in great demand in Hollywood. Every studio wanted a similar series, and Kaveney’s company, Trans R Us, was the leading supplier of suitable actresses. Kaveney’s products later went on to star in TV series such as Alias, and in movies such as the Underworld and Resident Evil series.

Her commercial success allowed Kaveney to return to her first love, writing. Realizing that no self-respecting “real” woman would write romance novels featuring kick-ass, monster-killing heroines, she began to write novels featuring characters similar to Buffy. The idea took off, and soon Kaveney found books by her pen names, including Laurell K. Hamilton, Carrie Vaughn and Kim Harrison were becoming best-sellers. Pretty much all of the early output of the paranormal romance and urban fantasy genres was penned by Kaveney herself. However, despite her success, women writers were willing to follow her example for fear of a public backlash, or being blacklisted by published who deemed their work insufficiently feminine. Unable to find suitable talent within the trans community, Kaveney hired a number of male ghost writers to write her books for her. Successful authors such as Tim Pratt, Daniel Abrahams, Ian McDonald, Sean Williams and John Scalzi all got their start ghost writing for Kaveney.

Although Kaveney is believed to be the first British trans woman to become a millionaire through her business interests, her wealth and fame is far eclipsed by that of the health industry mogul, Christine Burns. Around 2004 the Blair government began to run into problems recruiting staff for the National Health Service. Their program of gender equality in education had been so successful that all young women studying medicine now wanted to be doctors rather than nurses. Unfortunately a high profile study by the Royal College of Psychiatry had proved conclusively that male hospital patients are unlikely to recover successfully unless they have pretty young women to look after them. The shortage of female nurses looked set to result in a major health crisis.

Some of the shortage was made up through immigration, but Burns approached the government with the idea of transforming aspiring young male nurses into women. The idea proved very effective in solving the nurse shortage, and Burns was awarded an MBE for her services to the NHS. Indeed, so successful has she become that other companies in the UK health sector poured millions of pounds into Conservative Party coffers in the hope that they could win an election and put a stop to Burns. The NHS reforms championed by Andrew Lansley are the end result of this campaign. NHS staff, many of whom owe their jobs to Burns, are vociferously opposing the reforms. It remains to be seen whether Burns’ commercial empire will survive the assault.

Gender entrepreneurs have been successful in many other walks of British life. For example, the entertainment industry has long held that women simply aren’t funny. In any case, feminists have no sense of humor so there would be no sense in catering to them by providing women comedians. However, the general trend in society towards equal rights did require at least a semblance of balance. As a consequence, Bethany Black has built a substantial business out of supplying trans women comics, including Ellen De Generes, French & Saunders, and Jo Brand. You didn’t think they could be that funny if they were “real” women, did you, people?

The gender industry has been much slower on the uptake when it came to trans men, but one notable business has been built in sports. Back in 2006, Delia Smith was worried about the poor performance of her Norwich City football club. An internal enquiry had identified that a major problem was the team’s yellow shirts. They were deemed “too girly”, and as a consequence top flight players were unwilling to join the club. The enquiry recommended a change of strip, but Smith is a committed traditionalist who was unwilling to abandon not only the club’s colors, but also their nickname of The Canaries. Even the club badge would have to be changed. She turned instead to gender entrepreneur, Juliet Jacques, herself a life-long Norwich fan, and asked her if she could turn top quality female players into men.

The project took a long time to bear fruit. Amongst the teething problems was the fact that large doses of testosterone made trans men prone to fits of anger and violence. Some early models such as Robbie Savage and Joey Barton have become notorious for their poor disciplinary records. Eventually, however, the years of research paid off and Norwich is once again back near the top of the Premiership.

Meanwhile, determined to make the best of her initial failures, Jacques tried selling some of her early models to rugby clubs. This proved ideal, and although rugby is a much less wealthy sport it provided a healthy income for Jacques and her company. At one point she supplied the entire squad of the top Parisian team, Stade Français. This deal came to an end thanks to events in Italy.

In 2010 a newspaper owned by a rival media company exposed the fact that all of the prostitutes at one of Prime Minister Berlusconi’s famous orgies were actually trans women supplied by wealthy Italian gender entrepreneur, Vladimir Luxuria. As part of the fall-out from this, it was revealed that the Italian rugby captain, Sergio Parisse, a Stade Français player, was actually a trans man. The scandal spread back to France, and the Parisian club ended their deal with Jacques. The team has languished in the lower reaches of the French league ever since.

The gender industry is by no means confined to Europe. Indeed, it is currently playing a major role in US Politics. Back in 1998, Newt Gingrich was scouring Hollywood for a rugged, right-wing actor who could be groomed to be the next Ronald Reagan. Arnold Schwarzenegger was ineligible due to being foreign-born, and Gingrich found the majority of male Hollywood stars — people like Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio — to be a bunch of effeminate metrosexuals entirely unsuited for political office. Then he met up with gender entrepreneur, Calpernia Addams, and American politics changed forever.

The project was put on a back burner during the Shrub Presidency, and when it was revived early attempts to produce potential female candidates from right-wing males proved disastrous. The subjects were unable to successfully integrate their new female identities with the level of misogyny required of them. Projects such as Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann were notable failures. However, Addams then came up with a new idea. Combining the successful work of Juliet Jacques on trans men with the assistance of top quality Hollywood cosmetic surgeons and make-up artists, she began to develop a series of trans male replicants. These could take the place of under-performing Republican politicians and push the party line that Gingrich wanted. Products such as Rick Perry, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum have proved very successful with Republican voters in recent months.

Unusually Gingrich, who had tired of the hurly-burly of political life, also opted to have himself replaced by a replicant. His new career as mild-mannered investment consultant, “Bernie Madoff”, went very well until his business ran into trouble during the recent financial crisis. The real Gingrich has therefore been forced to watch from jail as his trans replicant hits the presidential campaign trail.

The hot young talent in the gender industry is Paris Lees. Tall and slender herself, Lees quickly realized that the standard shape for catwalk models doesn’t work for women. They simply don’t have, well, shape. So Lees began a modelling agency for trans women. Her initial products, Lea T and Andrej Pejić, have been hugely successful. Given Lees’ energy and business acumen, it seems likely that she’ll be the major supplier of catwalk models for years to come.

There have long been rumors in fandom that I am fantastically wealthy, and I can now reveal that much of my income has come from a burgeoning business in gender derivatives. The idea is deceptively simple. Rich couples are able to take out an option on the gender of future children. If a pregnancy turns out to be for a child different from what they wanted, the option pays out and they can afford gender reassignment surgery. Some of my customers have instead opted to have the unwanted child adopted, and to choose a new child of their own. This has led me to become close friends with prominent people in the celebrity adoption industry such as Madonna and Angelina Jolie. Many of my best clients come from European royal families. Indeed, Kevin and I will be attending the Monaco Grand Prix in style this year. Look out for us in the Royal Box during the trophy presentation.

Thanks to my interests in the gender industry, I am now financially secure and able to indulge in a little philanthropy. I have decided to help out the campaign for gender equality in the science fiction and fantasy community. It is well known that no “real” man would ever give up his place on a panel in favor of a woman. However, by licensing the trans replicant technology from Calpernia Addams, and severely toning down the testosterone doses, my staff have managed to create a range of male writer replicants with an interest in gender equality. As you might have guessed, one of our first products is Paul Cornell.

Unfortunately the real Paul Cornell didn’t take kindly to being replaced. He has converted to Catholicism and is currently studying at a remote monastery in the Calabrian Mountains in Southern Italy. He is a member of a new militant order of Catholic monks founded by Pope Ratty and financed by Berlusconi and prominent Mafia leaders. Penis Dei is devoted to saving the world from the Transgender Menace by hunting down trans people and selling their stories to British tabloid newspapers. Their headquarters are believed to be in Ireland, where they disguise themselves as mild-mannered, fun-loving bookmakers.

I would like to thank Julie Bindel and her tireless colleagues at the pressure group, Trans Empire Watch, for their help in preparing this article.

The management accepts that certain details presented in this article may be somewhat less than entirely factual, but they have been retained for artistic effect. We assert that the Truthiness quotient of this article is no less than that of some articles about trans people published by the Daily Malice. Furthermore we assert that, in the world of the UK’s tabloid newspapers, the concept of “truth” is entirely fungible and often used to indicate that the material in question is entirely made up.

And Another Thing: Attention Pagans

Overnight I was mailed a link to this post which details a current controversy in the Pagan community, specifically PantheaCon which, rather bravely, attempts to bring Pagans of all faiths together.

As some of you may know, especially if you have read Neil Gaiman’s A Game of You, there is a tendency towards transphobia in certain parts of the Pagan community. That, I am fairly certain, has links to the radical separatism of the 1970s, a period during which hatred for trans women was common amongst feminists. Certainly the language used by Z Budapest is very reminiscent of Raymond et al. And if you are setting up a female separatist community, and are religious, adopting a female goddess is entirely appropriate. But…

It saddens me that so many people of religious persuasion (not just Pagans) appear to be so wedded to the idea of biological essentialism and incapable of considering the existence of souls that may not match the bodies that they inhabit. Also, Liz Hand’s wonderful Waking the Moon contains food for thought. (It is a while since I read it, but I noticed on Twitter that Roz was re-reading it with joy yesterday.)

Anyway, if you are of a Pagan persuasion you may want to pop over there and consider what is being said. (Warning, it is long and quotes some fairly strong anti-trans language.)

And yes, I am aware of the issues surrounding a petition being raised by a Discordian. Sometimes organizations need a little chaos to disrupt their fossilized thinking.

Casualty Report

The first reports of casualties are starting to come in from the front. This morning a friend of mine was staying in a London hotel. At breakfast some of the staff started pointing her out, and one then came over and loudly asked if she had been in the Paddy Power ad. Other diners took note, and two business people at an adjacent table loudly demanded that they be moved so that they didn’t have to sit near her.

The good news is that the hotel management was furious. My friend had her bill cancelled and was offered 7 free night stays. The staff involved got a serious talking to. I gather the manager used the words “police” and “hate crime” to emphasize just how serious the matter was.

Sadly the hotel isn’t able to do anything about the other guests. I’d love to know who those two business people were, and why they thought that their behavior was in any way appropriate.

In this particular case the lady concerned was trans, but she’s also at that time of life when all of us who don’t have Joan Collins type fortunes start to lose our good looks. It is entirely possible that cis women will get the same sort of treatment.

Trans journalist Jane Fae covered the story this morning. She also mentioned another story in which a trans woman was cut up and rammed on the M25. The perp sped off quickly, but before he did he wound down the window and yelled, “Are you a fucking man or a woman?”

The good news is that the other side is also suffering casualties. Specifically, ClearCast, the regulatory body that initially approved the Paddy Power ad., has now reversed their decision. This means that the ad. can no longer be shown on UK television. So it sounds like my cricket watching has been saved. I did actually mail a letter to Sky early this morning so I’ll wait and see what response I get, but if they are at all professional they’ll manage to word it appropriately.

Of course the war isn’t over. Paddy Power are bleating pathetically on their blog about how they have been unfairly treated. Apparently they think that as long as an ad has more “likes” than “dislikes” on YouTube then it cannot be offensive. I expect outraged articles from the Malice and Sun complaining about how politically correct killjoys are ruining everyone’s right to abuse others. I also expect Paddy Power to post something on YouTube that makes their original ad. look positively trans-friendly by comparison. Still, this is a very significant victory.

There’s just one more thing I would like to add. Today on Gay Times Patrick Strudwick had a wonderful article about why LGB people should support trans folks. I’d like to quote one paragraph from it:

A 2009 study into transphobia across the European Union found that trans people are three times more likely to suffer from abuse than gay people. You might assume this report would depict Britain favourably, that we would come out well for trans folk, that our liberal nation would be a better place to live than, say, Hungary. But no. Trans people are more likely to be physically assaulted in Britain than any other EU country.

Gee, I wonder why that might be? Do you think it might have something to do with Britain having the most vicious tabloid media in Europe?

Update: I understand that the new Paddy Power ad. has indeed been banned before it could air. Apparently it involved threats to shoot people (though not trans people in this case).

Also we’ve got word that the new Sunday Sun will feature an article on “trans regret” which will imply that many trans women come to deeply regret losing their penises.

Exchanging Fire

I have a few quick reports from the battlefront today.

On my own part I have engaged in discussions with Sky, Channel 4 and Cheltenham Racecourse. I have also entered a formal complaint with the Advertising Standards Authority.

The Sky customer service people were duly apologetic and sorry to be losing me. As subscriptions are paid in advance they have a month or so to change their minds and win me back (though I won’t be watching in the meantime, I have had enough of that ad.). The guy I spoke to gave me an address to write to so that I could send the complaint up the chain.

Channel 4 were only able to help me lodge a formal complaint.

The discussion with Cheltenham was interesting. They told me that the whole thing was done without their knowledge or approval. They say that they lack the necessary trademarks to prevent Paddy Power from appearing to speak for them. Nevertheless they seem strangely reluctant to make a public statement dissociating themselves from the Paddy Power stunt.

Meanwhile, elsewhere on the front, Green Party MP Caroline Lucas has opened fire on The Sun. If you are lucky enough to live somewhere that has a sane MP you may be able to ask them to support that motion.

And finally, I received email from Change.org reporting some welcome success in the video games story I mentioned yesterday:

I would just like to let you all know that as of a couple of hours ago, BioWare have released a statement on their forums and their Twitter feed condemning the abuse directed at Jennifer Hepler, and pledging to donate $1000 to Bullying Canada on her behalf.

Which is exactly the sort of thing I am coming to expect from Bioware. They seem to be very good people.

War Bulletin

This is an update on my weekend post about the developing war between the UK media and trans people. As I noted, the tabloids will be looking for people on whom to wreak their revenge. For the past couple of days they have been full of stories about a 5-year-old child who has currently chosen to live as girl despite being assigned male at birth. I know that sounds young, but if I’d been given the same choice at the same age I’d have made the same decision. What’s important is that the kid then gets a chance to get on with her life. Unfortunately her name and photo are all over the papers. She and her parents have already received death threats. The newspaper reports contain sufficient information to find her home.

Meanwhile the Paddy Power story goes from bad to worse. Remember that they claimed to have consulted a “leading UK transgender association” in advance. Well they did. They spoke to the Beaumont Society. That’s an old, established organization that caters mainly to cross-dressers. They do try to help other types of trans people as well, but they are not always very good at it, this being a case in point. And of course the script of the ad changed significantly between between approved by the Beaumont Society and being broadcast. Journalists and advertisers, you can’t trust them an inch.

The good news is that the Advertising Standards Authority has agreed to investigate the ad. This means that complaining will help. You can do so here. The important points to note are: a) that you are not trans (assuming you are not, but it is non-trans people that will get listened to); b) that the main victims at the race day will be cis women who are deemed insufficiently pretty (trans people mostly can’t afford to go to the races); c) that in the meantime making a “sport” out of “tr*nny spotting” is going to lead to innocent trans women all over the UK (and insufficiently pretty cis women as well) being hounded and probably beaten up.

I’m also pleased to report that ESPN has decided to stop showing the ad. That’s remarkably encouraging. Unfortunately Channel 4 and Sky have refused to follow suit. For them the ad revenue is much more important than any harm the ad might cause.

So tomorrow I will be phoning Sky and cancelling my Sky Sports subscription. I’ll make it clear to them that I’ll sign up again if they stop showing the ad and apologize for the distress and danger that they have caused.

The whole mess has been further complicated by the emergency of technology that purports to determine your gender using face recognition technology. A children’s charity called Plan UK is in the news because they’ve come up with a cunning wheeze to highlight discrimination against women by making an ad that can only be seen by women. It will be on display at a bus stop in Oxford Street, London. When you stand in front of it, it will display the ad if it thinks you are female, and will be blank otherwise. There’s a BBC report here.

Of course this is going to catch quite a lot of trans people. If you transitioned late in life, and you couldn’t afford cosmetic surgery, then your features probably won’t be very feminine. But also the technique isn’t very precise. According to the BBC 10% of women will be wrongly identified as men. And yes, you guessed it, they will be women who are insufficiently young and pretty for white male tastes. It isn’t terribly precise either. I found an iPhone app that claims to use the same technology. Results for photos of me range from 18% female to 63% female. So ladies, be careful around bus stops in London in future. Because there might just be some drunk idiot playing the Paddy Power “stop the tr*nny” game who is using such ads as an aid. Your chances of being outed are quite high, regardless of whether you are trans or not.

Oh, and guys, you are not safe either. You know what idiots will say if the ad shows for you.

Finally, while we are on the subject of follow-up, remember my post about video games, in which I talked (mainly in the comment thread) about how I stopped playing them because I could never get past the action sequences? Well it seems to me that if you have a really good story then it would make sense to allow kultzes like me to skip those sections, but apparently if a well-known game designer suggests such a thing then its a crime worthy of a death sentence, and of course a sustained troll attack. More details here.

Notes from the Battlefront

Earlier this month I blogged about how trans people are becoming far more visible in British society, even appearing as respected political activists on the BBC. The downside of such visibility, of course, is that the minute you poke your head above the parapet you become a target. That has consequences.

Last week the British police arrested a number of prominent News International journalists who work on The Sun on suspicion of bribing both police and government officials. Tweaking the tabloids’ tails is dangerous. One of the main reasons why they have held such sway over British public life for decades is that people are rightly afraid of them. Tabloid journalists can be vicious bullies who can and will exact revenge on people who speak out against them. And if they can’t get at specific individuals they may take their anger out on any vulnerable minority they happen to notice.

There was a certain amount of irony, therefore, that at the same time as complaining bitterly about a “witch hunt” against their staff, The Sun was offering a reward for anyone who could give them the identity of a trans man in the UK who had given birth. Challenged on the issue, The Sun‘s editor claimed that the story was in the public interest because the man concerned might also be a serial killer. Presumably they were also planning a story about how men giving birth was disgusting and perverted, and perhaps demanding that the child be taken into care to prevent it being raised into a life of depravity. However, I understand that the Daily Mail may have beaten them to it on that one.

Meanwhile trans men in Britain have been living in fear of being outed to The Sun by people hoping for a reward. As Jane Fae reports in the post I linked to above:

In a separate development today, a spokeswoman for leading trans action group, Trans Panthers UK revealed how a trans man whose sister had recently given birth was today hounded out of his workplace by fellow workers threatening to “out” him in return for the reward offered by the Sun newspaper.

It is a war. There will be casualties. Some of them will be innocent bystanders.

Of course journalists are not the only people wanting to take advantage of the current notoriety of trans people. Step forward, therefore, Paddy Power. For those of you not based in the UK or Ireland, these people are bookmakers. That means that they are already potentially in the business of exploiting the vulnerable. I understand that gambling is a fun pastime enjoyed by many people. Kevin gets a lot of value out of playing blackjack. And I used to work in a bookmaker’s during vacations when I was at college; I know that there are people who are real experts on horses who quite often do very well as a result. However, I also saw that the bookmakers make their profits from those who are less able: the drunks, the desperate, and those simply not smart enough to figure the odds, but who keep hoping that their luck will turn. Responsible bookmakers know this and take care of their customers, irresponsible ones exploit it.

Paddy Power are no strangers to controversy either. They like being out on the edge as far as their advertising goes. They’ve done some ads poking fun at hipsters with smart phones that I found quite funny. They were also responsible for one of the most complained about ads of 2011, in which a blind footballer is shown mistaking a cat with a bell on its collar for the ball (blind people, apparently, play football using a ball that makes a noise when it moves). The Advertising Standards Authority cleared the ad, and the controversy got a lot of publicity for Paddy Power, a lesson I am sure they took to heart.

This year they have just started running an ad for the Cheltenham Festival, a horse racing event. The idea behind the ad is that on Ladies’ Day punters should play the game of “spot the tr*nny”.

Yes, you did read that right.

My guess is that the main effect of this, as far as Cheltenham is concerned, will be a great deal of harassment of female race-goers at the event itself. There will be plenty of drunk people on the lookout for any woman that they deem insufficiently pretty, or trying overly hard to be glamorous, and accusing them of being “really men”. Women planning to attend Ladies’ Day at Cheltenham this year will need to be prepared to have their breasts prodded by drunken louts asking, “are they real?”

For trans women, of course, the reality will be rather different. Most of them can’t afford to go to the races. They won’t be there to be outed. But in the meantime they will have to live through a time when anyone who watches TV where the Paddy Power ad airs will be encouraged to play “spot the tr*nny”. That, inevitably, will lead to people being abused and chased through the streets, and being beaten up. It may lead to them being hounded out of their jobs and homes. A fairly recent survey found that around 34% of UK trans people have attempted suicide. I confidently predict that number will rise this year.

None of this will affect Paddy Power or the Cheltenham Festival. It won’t be their friends or relatives that are affected. And it is pretty clear from the way that they are going about this that the whole point of the ad campaign is to generate controversy. Cheltenham even posted the ad on their Facebook page with an exhortation to their fans to have their say on whether it is offensive or not. Last I looked the comments thread was full of complaints from trans people, but I suspect that by the end of Monday it will have filled up with the usual sort of comments you get on tabloid newspaper stories about trans people.

So no, Paddy Power and Cheltenham Festival will not suffer. They will happily bask in the column inches that they gain from this, and the extra money that they expect to make as a result.

That, however, is not the end of the story. Challenged on the issue, Paddy Power revealed that they had cast actual trans people in the ad, and that they had, “sought approval for the commercial from a leading UK transgender association”. Note that they did not say that they got approval. Nor is it clear whether the people recruited knew how their appearances would be used. Given that the trans umbrella is fairly broad, it is possible that the people involved are all drag queens and part-time cross dressers who live most of their lives as males. Whatever, it is causing a great deal of finger pointing and recriminations. The point here, however, is that there is money on offer, and when you are trying to victimize members of a despised minority community there will always be someone amongst them desperate enough to take your money.

There’s a war being fought, and the gloves are off. There are no rules.

Introducing META

Hot on the heels of Wednesday’s excitement comes another landmark day for trans people in the UK. META magazine, which is produced by, and aimed primarily at trans people, is now available from the iTunes store.

META is edited by my friend Paris Lees, ably assisted by the fabulous Roz Kaveney. Speaking as someone who has produced a digital magazine, I have to say that I am seriously impressed by the production quality. The content, of course, may not be of much interest to people outside of the trans community, but there is an article by Roz talking about the nature of that community entitled “Cat Herding”. I’m sure you can all relate to that.

For those of you who are interested, the app is only $1. I believe that future issues will need to be paid for, but you can get the first one for free. More information is available via Twitter, on Tumblr, and on Facebook. I understand from Paris that there will be versions for other platforms, starting with Android, available soon.

To be a success I think the magazine will need to gain a worldwide readership. You know who you are. Please buy it.

Update: This is where you can buy META if you are not an Apple user.

Juliet Jacques at Hydra

Last night’s LGBT History Month event saw some actual, serious history. Juliet Jacques, best known for her “Transgender Journey” column in The Guardian gave a presentation on how gender variance was viewed in Victorian England. We had a great crowd, and Juliet was excellent.

One of the things that became very obvious during her presentation is that doing histories of trans people is very hard. Any group of people who are marginalized by society is unlikely to leave much in the way of records. Most of the material that Juliet had to work with comes in the form of court records, and the associated media coverage of the cases.

Furthermore, in Victorian times there was no concept of gender, let alone gender identity. The only reason that people of the time could conceive for a woman to dress as a man would be for economic advantage — to be able to take jobs from which women were normally excluded. The only reason that they could conceive for a man to dress as a woman would be in order to solicit sex with other men.

Given that buggery was a crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison, no one arrested for “female personation” was going to admit to wanting to be a woman, or even to liking wearing women’s clothes. Anyone appearing in court would excuse his behavior by claiming that he had dressed up as a lark, or with some other creative excuse. I liked the chap who claimed he was doing an art project to do with women’s clothing, but by far the star excuse came from a Rev. Holmes, a minister from a small Scottish splinter church. He claimed to be surveying the dark underbelly of London society with a view to finding sinners and rescuing them. The judge, quite reasonably, asked him why he found it necessary to dress in women’s clothing in order to do so.

The most notorious case from the period is that of Boulton and Park, who were both found not guilty. Thanks to the tradition of double jeopardy, once acquitted they could no longer be tried again for dressing as women. Ernest Boulton went on to have a successful career as a drag artist.

The other complexity that I hope is obvious from all of this is that in Victorian times there was no effective difference between gender identity and sexual orientation. Because society assumed that any man dressed as a woman must be doing so in order to solicit sex, every man who crossed-dressed was, by definition, gay. As a consequence it is very difficult for an historian to separate the history of trans people from that of gay people. All we can do is speculate on the motives of the people who stories we discover, and it may well be that the prevailing social attitudes colored their identities.

My thanks again to Hydra Books for providing an excellent venue, to Juliet for a wonderful talk, and to everyone who attended.

Trans On TV

Many years ago, when the only places trans people could go to for support were transvestite clubs, I remember there being a series of light-hearted cartoons with the title of “What’s on the TV Tonight”. I think they were drawn by Janett Scott. The joke, of course, revolves around the use of TV as an abbreviation for both transvestite and television. No one would have believed, in the last few years of the 20th Century, that transsexuals would ever appear on television as respected public figures.

Oh how times have changed.

This morning Paris Lees of Trans Media Watch appeared twice on BBC Breakfast. I’ll talk later about why exactly she was there, but the simple version is that she was on as a representative of a respectable pressure group, much as they might use someone from Stonewall, Greenpeace, or an arts charity.

That was live, broadcast TV, but the BBC also does a lot of Internet broadcasting these days, in particular through their Democracy Live website, which streams content from Parliament and other venues for public debate. Today Helen Belcher, also of Trans Media Watch, was giving evidence to the Leveson inquiry.

For those of you not resident in the UK, or who hide away from all current affairs stories, Leveson was set up in the wake of the phone and email hacking scandals at the News of the World and other prominent UK newspapers. The inquiry has fairly broad terms of reference and is looking at a wide range of different areas of concern. That it should accept evidence from a trans pressure group, however, is remarkable, and a testament to how hard Paris, Helen and their colleagues have worked over the past year or so.

The TMW evidence was largely concerned with the way in which trans people are systematically mis-represented, pilloried and abused by the national press. Local media is often much more honest in its handling of trans stories, but the national press may then take those stories, plagiarize the content, print photographs without permission, and falsely present the story as if the subject had agreed to be interviewed. They routinely mis-gender trans people, even when the correct pronouns have been used in the articles they are plagiarizing. It is also standard practice to mock the appearance of trans people, and make juvenile jokes about their genitals.

An important part of Helen’s evidence was the many ways in which newspaper editors and their stooges in the Press Complaints Commission get around complaints. For example, the PCC declined to specifically include gender identity as a protected characteristic in their code of practice, claiming that this was already covered by the word “gender”, but then when complaints are made they may excuse the newspaper by saying that “gender” does not include gender identity. Where innuendo is used to mock people, they refuse to acknowledge any meaning for words other than precise dictionary definitions. Newspapers will also pick up sensationalist stories from press agencies without checking them, and then wash their hands of any responsibility when those stories prove inaccurate or offensive.

Most damagingly, attacks on trans people by newspapers most often occur when those people are beginning to transition. This is bad in many different ways. Firstly, of course, transition is a very stressful time for trans people, and unwanted attention from the media can make things much worse, for example by making previously supportive family and employers back away. In addition, transition is also the time when trans people look least convincing in their preferred gender, and are therefore most easily mocked. Newspaper behavior is often akin to taking a picture of someone with a leg in plaster and on crutches, and then making jokes about their inability to walk, implying that they will never be able to do so again.

The key issue, however, and probably the one that newspaper editors are most concerned with, is legality. Deliberately outing a trans person who has completed transition and acquired a Gender Recognition Certificate is a criminal offense. But you can’t get a GRC until you have completed transition. Newspapers therefore target trans people when they are still vulnerable and not protected by law. They will also go after people who, for various reasons, are unable to acquire a GRC, most obviously children.

A common question in all of these cases is whether there is any “public interest” in these stories. That is, does the public have a need to know. As Helen noted, newspapers often have difficulty distinguishing between what is in the public interest, and what the public might be interested in. Even that, however, is too subtle for Paul Dacre, editor of the Daily Malice, which runs six times as many stories about trans people as any other UK newspaper. In his evidence to the inquiry he claimed that it was necessary to run stories of this type in order to expose immoral behavior, thereby indicating that he thinks simply being trans is something immoral that he and his newspaper have a duty to stamp out.

It is also worth noting that the PCC will currently only accept complaints from people actually featured in stories. One of the possible changes that Lord Justice Leveson is considering is a change to procedure to allow organizations like Trans Media Watch to complain on behalf of the victims. This is important, both because most trans people have very little money, and because after having been attacked in the press they may not have the emotional strength left to launch a complaint by themselves. The Trans Media Watch submission to the inquiry included many examples of innocent people whose lives were blighted by newspaper stories over the years. Not one of them was willing to have their name attached to their evidence, for fear that doing so would only result in their stories being recycled by the press as an act of revenge.

Helen’s evidence will probably be available on replay at the Democracy Live website’s Leveson page from tomorrow.

Back then, to Paris on the BBC. It appears that the Breakfast TV show is not available for replay on iPlayer, and as yet no one has uploaded the material to YouTube. However, the story that Paris was on to talk about has been widely covered elsewhere. Also on the show was 10-year-old Livvy James who is currently transitioning while at school. Livvy, being so young, has no protection under the law. Her mother says the school has been doing its best, but there is little they can do when other parents are actively encouraging their children to bully Livvy.

Interestingly, despite what is being reported in newspapers, Livvy said she has had less bullying since she came out as trans. Prior to this she had been living as a girl at home, and going to school as a boy, and people found this hard to understand. This may indicate that the message about trans people is getting through to the public.

Also Livvy’s mum said that her daughter’s school performance had improved dramatically since she went full time female. I can relate to this. I spent a lot of time off school sick when I was a kid, and I was often trotted in front of the educational psychologist because my teachers felt there must be something wrong. I knew exactly what was wrong, but in those days it would have been so much worse for me had I said anything, so I became very adept at making excuses.

While the behavior of other parents is deeply regrettable, Livvy and her mother are in no doubt where the real blame lies. They point firmly at national newspaper articles about trans people, which are almost always negative and encourage readers to think the worst of trans people. Livvy’s mum has started an online petition asking the Press Association to put a stop to these attacks. It is doing rather better then the one that was launched last year during the airing of My Transsexual Summer. If you’d like to sign up, you can find it here. You may also wish to show your support for Livvy at her Facebook page.

And finally, if you want to learn more about trans kids and the problems they face, there is a new book, Transitions of the Heart, due out in May in which the mothers of trans children tell their stories. I understand that it has an introduction from Kim Pearson of TYFA, so it should be good.

My History Month Talk

My LGBT History Month talk last night went rather well, I though. We had 24 people there, which is much better than any of the Bristol Festival of Literature events we did last year. It was also a very varied group. There were LGBT activists, trans people, political radicals associated with Hydra Books, and BristolCon people. I like doing cross-fertilization.

The audience noted the large number of impressive feminist works coming from Australia. I should note that books by male Australian writers such as Stephen Dedman and Sean Williams also address gender changes.

I promised I’d do a reading list with all of the books I mentioned. Some people on Twitter were asking for a transcript. I didn’t do a recording because I knew that there would likely be trans people in the audience and I don’t want to scare anyone, but I’ve added some notes here regarding why particular books were mentioned.

There are, of course, many more SF&F books that feature trans people. Many of them I know about, and quite a lot I don’t. Feel free to suggest other titles in comments. The list is below the fold. I have linked to my reviews where available and where the review addresses the gender themes. Note that some of these reviews are quite old and I may have changed my view of some of the books. See also this essay which I wrote for ICFA two years ago and which was published in Finnish (I think in Cosmos Pen) last year.
Continue reading

Worth A Thousand Words

One of the things that worried me about the talk I’m giving tomorrow is how much education some of the audience might need before I can start to talk about trans characters in books. But now, problem solved, I will just hand out copies of this.

Genderbread Person

It’s not perfect. Asexual people, in particular, are liable to be spitting furious about being left out. But it is a lot better than having to spend half an hour explaining the issues.

There’s a long discussion of the issues raised in the infographic, and a larger, printable version of the image here.

Two Quick Links

If any of you were wondering how you might support the Girl Scouts of Colorado who agreed to admit a young trans girl to their ranks, you can now donate directly thanks to the good folks at TYFA. This link won’t be up for long. In the longer term the Girl Scouts movement wants donations to go into a central anti-bullying fund, not just to one troop, which seems wise. All is explained on the TYFA site.

(And Kim, you rock! Still. 🙂 )

On a much less happy note, various news feeds today have reported an horrific story of a young trans girl in Germany who is in danger of being committed to a mental health institution because her father disapproves of her identity. Here’s Pink News. And well done Jane for breaking the story.

Canada Air Travel Update

The Canada air travel thing has been getting a lot of traction around the Internet since I posted yesterday, even reaching the pages of Jezebel. The issue is getting a lot of attention from feminists, because it could so easily be used to target cis women. If you have short hair, don’t wear make-up, and for comfort have decided to travel in jeans, a baggy t-shirt and sneakers, you could, under these regulations, be denied boarding. Airline and security officials should not be given the power to police how people dress.

As far as we know, that isn’t happening, and it seems it would probably be OK for me to travel. However, it is certainly a badly worded regulation that could easily be mis-used, and it is a very real issue for many trans people who are barred from using air travel as a result.

There is, as usual, an online petition. If you are Canadian you might also consider writing to the Minister for Transport:

Hon. Denis Lebel, Ministre des Transports | Minister of Transport
Courriel | E-mail: denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca
Phone: 613-996-6236
Fax: 613-996-6252
Adresse postale (sans timbre) | Mailing Address (postage free) : Hon. Denis Lebel, Chambre des communes/House of Commons, Ottawa ON K1A 0A6

Canadian Travel Regulations

Hello Canada. I think this one is probably a false alarm, but I’d appreciate some feedback all the same.

It began this morning when I found an alarming note in my Twitter feed about the Canadian government banning trans people from flying into or out of the country. These days, of course, I am way too suspicious to take any alarms on Twitter at face value, so I researched the story. As far as I can see, this is largely a question of sloppily worded regulations and, given that they have been in force for 5 months now, if they were being implemented in a problematic way then I think we’d have heard about it. At the very least, Mercedes Allen would have written about the issue. But all is quiet, so I’m guessing that Canadian officials are being sensible about the whole thing.

The regulations in question are those pertaining to identity screening at airports. You can read the whole thing on the Department of Justice website, but the salient sections are as follows:

5.2 (1) An air carrier shall not transport a passenger if

(c) the passenger does not appear to be of the gender indicated on the identification he or she presents;

I don’t think that this was deliberately drafted to target trans people. I suspect it is a product of that fashionable Western conservative paranoia about those Muslim women with the all-encompassing clothing actually being male terrorists in disguise. Because that’s totally what they’d do in a James Bond movie, or an episode of 24, right? Quite why any sane terrorist would dress as a woman and then present his own passport is a mystery me to, but there you go.

I note also that, under the regulations, airlines should deny boarding to anyone who doesn’t look like they do in their passport. So Canadian women, be very wary about getting your hair re-styled or colored. And men, try not to go bald in a hurry. (Yes, I know I’ve just been gender essentialist there. Please add suitable exceptions.)

The problem, as I’m sure that you are all aware, is that people undergoing gender transition, people who have transitioned but elected not to have surgery, and people who are not binary-identified, can appear of indeterminate gender, or of a different gender to that of their passport. And with the new fashion for perv scanners and security groping such people are liable to be detected even if their outward gender presentation matches their ID. As there haven’t been any high profile cases, I suspect that the authorities are being understanding.

The main reason I took an interest is that, as I have a pile of frequent flier points left, I am hoping to go to Toronto for World Fantasy this year. I don’t want to end up being denied permission to board. Given that I’m post-op, hopelessly girly, and have both a passport and a birth certificate stating that I’m female, I don’t think I’ll have a problem. But I’m writing about the issue anyway, partly to highlight how thoughtlessly such regulations get drafted, and partly just in case things are worse and I just haven’t heard about them.

Update: As if by magic, Mercedes posted today. She’s likely to be the best source of information on this issue.

Deconstructing Comedy

Well, here we go again. Yet another UK comedian has managed to set my Twitter feed alight with a sketch about trans people. This time, somewhat surprisingly, the perp in question is Jonathan Ross. I say surprisingly because Ross knows a number of trans people. I’ve heard good and bad on this, but I understand that he knows Roz Kaveney quite well, and he’s close friends with Neil Gaiman. His wife, of course, wrote X-Men First Class, which might fail on race issues but has gone down very well with my white LGBT friends. And their eldest daughter has recently come out as a lesbian. He’s not the sort of guy I would expect to pick on trans people.

Nevertheless, as this post from Paris Lees explains, Wossy has managed to cover himself in do-dos as far as the trans community is concerned. There has been a certain amount of yelling on Twitter. I thought it might be useful if I tried to apply this lessons I learned from this post to try to find out what is going on.

The first thing we need to remember is that Ross probably didn’t write the jokes himself. Normally I would have thought that he is a big enough star to have objected to offensive material, but perhaps his recent troubles have made him less willing to kick up a fuss with his paymasters. We can’t know one way or another on that. What I am pretty sure about, however, is that whoever did write the jokes was aware of the fuss caused by the Russell Howard sketch that Paris refers to. Certainly most people in the trans community know about it, and the comedy-writing fraternity is a similarly small and gossipy group. I suspect that some of the outrage arises from the suspicion that we have been deliberately baited. That is, someone remembered how angry we got first time around, and figured that as he had an excuse to roll out similar material he could get a similar level of publicity. Ross is taking the rap for this right now, but I want to know who the writer is who deliberately went fishing for outrage.

What about the material itself? If you’ve clicked through on Paris’s post then you’ll know that the jokes were all about the supposed “ladyboy” stewardesses on a Thai airline. See those scare quotes? They are there for a reason. The Ladyboys of Bangkok stage show is a drag act. The whole point of it is that the audience knows that the people they are seeing on stage are really men. They are drag artists, like Ru Paul, not women. And Ross’s jokes are all about people who look like women but are really men.

Except it is not that simple. While Thailand might have a cultural tradition of cross-dressing, the kathoeys, as trans women are known there, are not much better off in Thailand than trans women are in the West. Getting a job a as ladyboy might feel like being in a freak show for a transsexual, but it is better than prostitution, and if you are careful you might be able to earn enough money for your gender realignment surgery. Therefore, at least some of the performers you see in a ladyboy show probably do identify as female.

More importantly in this case, the airline is not hiring ladyboys. It is hiring kathoeys, and it is doing so because the owner of the airline wants to give them a chance at a job that isn’t being a drag act or a prostitute. Obviously he’s getting a lot of publicity as well, but he’s not putting these girls out there and saying “guess which ones are men”, he’s employing people who live full time as women and identify as women.

Does Ross know this? Possibly not, because most of the UK media has covered the story using the term “ladyboy”. That, of course, is partly because a lot of UK journalists may not understand the difference between a transsexual and a drag act, but mainly because they want their readers to think that all trans people are just amateur drag acts because that makes it easier to ridicule them.

(Incidentally, one of the reasons I love the movie Priscilla Queen of the Desert is that it tries hard to explain the difference between a transsexual and a drag act. I was rather saddened to read in a review that the stage show mostly loses this.)

So the situation we have here is that Ross appears to think he’s making fun of drag artists, whereas anyone who knows the story well sees him making fun of transsexuals. If people are approaching the jokes from a different frame of reference then it is understandable that one side find them funny and the other does not. But the frame of reference that Ross is using is an inaccurate one deliberately spread by British newspapers with the intention of inspiring the sort of mockery that Ross’s writers have provided. What is actually happening is that the airline is taking people from a despised minority group who find it difficult to get work, and giving them good jobs. That’s not something we should be mocking. In particular we shouldn’t be mocking it using exactly the offensive and inaccurate stereotyping that makes it hard for these people to get jobs in the first place.

Finally I want to zero in on one joke in particular. It’s the one where Ross says, “Unlike most airlines, they’re actually encouraging you to take a concealed weapon on board.” Obviously this is as much a joke about airline security as about trans people, and as such I found it funny. Then I stopped and thought about what it said. First up, of course, there’s no guarantee that the stewardesses have penises. I hope that the airline doesn’t make surgery a condition of employment, but they may have done, and the women will likely have had it done anyway if they could afford it. Whatever, the joke simply doesn’t work once you know that the stewardesses probably don’t have penises (or “nuts” either, for that matter).

The real problem with this joke, however, is that a penis is only a “weapon” if it belongs to a rapist. And here Ross’s joke is playing straight into the scaremongering meme so beloved of American Christianists that trans women only dress as women so that they can get close to real women and rape them. That’s the sort of stereotyping that gets trans women killed. It’s not the sort of idea that ought to be used in a joke. I suspect that no one involved with the show saw the joke this way, but once you know anything about trans rights politics the implication is obvious. It should also be obvious why people are furious about it.

On The Radio

Last night I had a brief slot on Bristol Community Radio’s LGBT show, Shout Out, where my friend Andy Foyle and I talked about events that we have planned for LGBT History month. We come on just past the half way point of the show. All of the shows are available for listening here. I can’t find a link to the specific show’s web page, but you can download the MP3 here.

LGBT History Month

February, at least in the UK, is LGBT History Month. Somewhat unexpectedly, I have found myself involved in this. My friend Eugene Byrne, who has a keen interest in local history, introduced me to a group called Out Stories Bristol (OSB). That had no trans members at the time, so I figured I should stick my hand up. One thing led to another, and I found myself organizing some events.

The full list of local events can be found at the newly launched OSB website. If you are not local, you might find something of interest on the national site. If you want to see what I have been helping make happen, the literary stuff is all on the Hydra Books website.

I’m delighted that Juliet Jacques and Louis Bailey have agreed to come to Bristol and give talks. As you may notice, I’m also giving one myself.

I have also been asked to appear on Shout Out, Bristol Community Radio’s LGBT show, to talk about the events. That will be on Thursday night, local time. The show should be available internationally as a podcast after the live broadcast. With me on the show is Andy Foyle, who knows far more about local history than I do, and is also an expert on architectural history.

I think I’m giving that talk elsewhere later in the year as well, but I’ll wait until the publicity is online before promoting it.