Riversend

Sylvia Kelso’s sequel to Amberlight continues in a similar vein of exploring gender issues without providing any pat answers. I don’t expect Riversend to be any more popular with the current crop of feminist fandom than Amberlight was, but I’m still enjoying the series.

Kelso is still busily torturing her characters by any means possible, but manages to justify the various plot twists fairly well. Also either I’m getting used to her style, or she’s got easier to read since the previous book. There are still a lot of passages where the characters talk in nuances and you have to work out what they were conveying to each other, but the prose appears to flow more easily now.

There are, apparently, more books on the way.

I’ve been asked to write something about feminist SF for Tahtivaeltaja and will have more to say about the books in that. You do all read fine Finnish semiprozines, don’t you…

How Bad Laws Get Written

As some of you will know, there is an “Equality” bill currently progressing through the UK parliament. There are many bad things about the bill, some of which I have written about before, but not all of this is deliberate. Writing laws is hard, especially when you have smart lawyers ready and waiting to pick holes in everything you do.

The really bad stuff is, I think, a result of MPs having been convinced of the need for exceptions in “special cases”. They try to be fair to everyone, but with something like an civil rights the minute you create a special case you drive a coach and horses through the protections you are supposed to be creating, because everyone who wants to carry on discriminatory practices will immediately begin to present what they do in a manner in which, their lawyers can argue, they qualify for the exemption. In the case of this particular bill the loopholes are so loosely written that merely claiming to be prejudiced against trans people gives you the right to discriminate against them.

A really spectacular mistake can be found in the bill’s definition of trans people. It presents two examples, one of a person who has undergone hormone treatment and surgery, and one who merely chooses to live in the opposite gender, does so full time, and is generally accepted by society in that gender. Those are indeed two very common types of trans people (though it doesn’t cover everyone). However, in the first example the person described has transitioned from male to female, whereas in the second example the person has transitioned from female to male. The effect of this, once it gets into the courts, will be that female-to-male trans people are protected in all circumstances, but male-to-female trans people will be protected only if they have had surgery, because lawyers will argue that the examples clearly show that MtFs are held to a more stringent requirement than FtMs.

It is a messy business, making laws, but if you don’t get it right then you can create exactly the opposite effect to what you intended to do.

Why It Matters

Much of the discussion around the blogosphere about the KRXQ shock jock case has focused on freedom of speech. Surely, people argue, Rob Williams and Arnie States have a right to say what they want about transgender people. And of course under current US law they do. The fact that much of the rest of the country is outraged at their ignorant and hateful comments should be punishment enough. But sadly such issues also have wider ramifications. As one commenter here noted, transgender people are 17 times more likely to be murdered than the average US citizen. Other statistics, published by HRC but now a little old, suggest that transgender people living in the US have a 1 in 12 chance of having their lives ended by murder.

In September 2008 the body of a transgender woman, Ruby Molina, was found floating in the American River in Sacramento – part of the area that KRXQ serves. The police identified her death as “suspicious” and offered a $1000 reward for any information that might help them resolve the case. As far as I can see from trawling the Internet this morning, no progress has been made on this. Whoever murdered Ruby Molina has got away with it.

This is by no means an isolated case. Transgender people are murdered on a regular basis all over the USA. Mostly their killers are not brought to justice. Even if they are, they are often let off because juries take the attitude of another commenter: that transgender people are “weirdos and freaks”. If you dehumanize someone in this way, then killing them apparently doesn’t matter.

My search for news about Ruby Molina did bring up this report from the Sacramento News & Review about a memorial service for Ruby and other victims of anti-LGBT violence. The report quotes Dr. Gregory M. Herek, a professor of psychology at UC Davis:

Herek also pointed out that “when individuals perceive that they have some sort of ‘permission’ to attack members of minority groups, they will do so.”

This is what people like Williams and States have in mind when they launch public attacks against people they hate. They know that they may not get away with murdering people themselves, and probably they don’t have the courage to do so. However, they are well aware that by defaming particular groups of people in strident and defamatory tones on the radio they will encourage other people – people who are less smart and less cowardly than themselves – to do the dirty work for them. Because they haven’t explicitly incited murder they know that they can hide behind their freedom of speech rights and avoid any responsibility for what they have said, but they know all too well what the effects of their words will be on others. It is murder by proxy performed by cowards.

Shock Jocks Update

I’m beginning to dig my way out of the email and blog backlog and I’m pleased to discover that progress is being made on the KRXQ-FM shock jock case. I learned from this blog that Dr. Pepper and Chipotle restaurants have both pulled their advertising from the station. Hopefully some of the public outrage prompted those decisions. Good work, people of California. Let’s keep up the pressure. Because, you know, inciting violence against children is not a good use of radio station air time.

Here’s GLAAD’s coverage of the issue. And from this blog post I see we can add Verizon, Bank of America and Carl’s Jr to the list of ad withdrawals.

Shock Jocks Hit New Low

It is a tough life being a right wing shock jock in the US right now. The Rethuglicans appear to be making the classic mistake of reacting to an electoral mistake by emphasizing the sort of policies that got them chucked out of office in the first place, and to stay shocking the radio hate merchants have to somehow manage to move even further to the right. But therein lies a problem. In the “good old days” it was probably possible to get a rise out of people by suggesting a lynch mob, or a roasting of a witch, or some other such random act of violence. These days, however, your victims might actually decide to fight back, and that might be painful (either physically or in court). What is a poor demagogue to do?

Well, two smart arses in Sacramento have come up with a whiz idea. Being too timid to suggest going after adults they don’t like, they have decided to prove their manliness by encouraging their listeners to go out and bully children. I wonder how many cans of Bud they had to sink before getting up the courage to do that?

Government Newspeak

I’ve just been filling in a questionnaire for Press for Change, who have been trawling through the trans sections of the proposed new Equality Bill for gotchas. As far as I can make out, the bits of the bill that relate to trans people go as follows:

1. It shall be illegal to discriminate against transsexuals (but not other gender-variant people) in cases of employment, provision of training or provision of services.

Except that:

2. Any person or organization who believes that allowing transsexuals access to employment, provision or training or provision of services is inappropriate on the grounds of their being transsexuals may discriminate against them.

3. It shall be a criminal offense for transsexuals to fail to disclose their nature when applying for jobs, training, etc.

Yes, that’s an “Equality” bill. George Orwell would have been proud.

The Absurdity of American Marriage

Despite what many people outside the USA believe, it is by no means a single country with a single set of laws and a single set of cultural attitudes. Sometimes this can be a good thing, but sometimes the differences in laws between states, or even between parts of the same state, can cause an awful lot of confusion. Jenny Boylan has an article in the NY Times talking about how the current mishmash of legislation regarding gender changes and same-sex marriage affects trans people. Here she quotes a lawyer from one case that came to trial:

Taking this situation to its logical conclusion, Mrs. Littleton, while in San Antonio, Tex., is a male and has a void marriage; as she travels to Houston, Tex., and enters federal property, she is female and a widow; upon traveling to Kentucky she is female and a widow; but, upon entering Ohio, she is once again male and prohibited from marriage; entering Connecticut, she is again female and may marry; if her travel takes her north to Vermont, she is male and may marry a female; if instead she travels south to New Jersey, she may marry a male.

It really is a mess. Hopefully the USA will eventually get things sorted out at a federal level.

DSM V Petition

The American Psychiatric Association’s annual general meeting is taking place in San Francisco next week. In advance of that an online petition has appeared. It is a rather good one. Here’s what it says:

“We, the undersigned, support the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) own goal of making its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) a scientific document, based on empirical research and devoid of cultural bias. A diagnosis of a mental disorder can have a severe adverse impact on employment opportunities, child custody determinations, an individual’s well-being, and other areas of functioning. Therefore we urge the APA to remove all diagnoses that are not based upon peer-reviewed, empirical research, demonstrating distress or dysfunction, from the DSM. The APA specifically should not promote current social norms or values as a basis for clinical judgments.”

Got that? The APA specifically should not promote current social norms or values as a basis for clinical judgments. I think that says it all really. The purpose of psychiatry should be to help people who are distressed, not to invent “paraphilias” as an excuse for persecuting people who are going about their lives peaceably and happily, but don’t happen to conform to what some psychiatrist thinks should be “normal”.

This is not just about pathologizing trans people. It is about protecting kids from being forced into rigid gender roles; it is about not going back to the days in which being gay was seen as a “mental disorder”; and not going back to the days in which a woman who enjoyed sex could be labeled a “nymphomaniac” and put in an asylum.

You can find the petition here.

And if you are in San Francisco on the 18th details of the protest can be found on Facebook.

Thank you.

IDAHO Goes Trans

No, this is not news of another US state passing civil rights legislation. IDAHO is the International Day Against Homophobia & Transphobia. It takes place on May 17th, so expect to see more news in the next week or so. For now, however, I’d like to note that this year’s campaigning will be specifically targeted towards tacking Trans issues. There’s an appeal, directed at the UN and WHO. At some point they’ll doubtless be asking for signatures, but for now they are apparently just looking for high profile people and organizations who would like to sign so that they can roll out a whole bunch of big names on the 17th. I know I’m not famous enough, but maybe some of the people reading this are. Further details here.

Glam in Glamorgan

Ever wondered what the Doctor Who & Torchwood crew get up to in Cardiff when not doing stuff for the BBC? Well some of them make movies. About drag queens.

Thanks to Gabriel Strange, who is Location Manager for the project, I have discovered A Very British Cover-Up, a movie about royalty, murder and drag queens. It looks like a lot of fun. For rugby fans, Colin Charvis is going to be in it. And for Torchwood fans, Gareth David-Lloyd will be in it, and John Barrowman is donating goodies to help raise money for the production.

I’d think about attending the launch party next month, except there’s no way I could out-glam those boys.

More On Crazy Psychiatrists

Around this time last year I did a blog post about the psychiatry and gender identity that attracted a lot of attention (thank you again, Patrick). The basic issue here is about the use of diagnosis of “mental disorder” to stigmatize and bully not only adult transgender people, but also children who fail to conform to their parents’ or psychiatrists’ views of what is “normal” gendered behavior.

One of the things that prompted me to make this post was watching an excellent TV program about the issue. It was made by In the Life, an Internet-based LBGT TV company, and it is well worth a look. The material on gender disorder occupies the first half of the program, and lasts about 15 minutes.

(The rest of the program is also worth watching. There’s an interview with Mara Kiesling about US Federal law issues. I’ve been following Mara’s tweets from the House of Representatives today and I’m delighted to report that the Hate Crimes Bill passed with a majority of 249-175. Bay Area people, please ask Pete Stark why he didn’t vote. And the final segment is about the very wonderful Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.)

Of course there is a reason why such things are suddenly news again. The working group set up by the American Psychiatric Association to look into revising their diagnostic guidelines has recently produced an interim report. As this analysis by Dr. Kelley Winters explains, the news is not good. Indeed, due to the inability of the psychiatrists concerned to write grammatically clear English, the proposed new rules can also be interpreted as defining masturbation as the product of a mental disorder.

In addition the APA is having their annual conference in May. Guess where it is. Yep, got it in one. Moscone Center, San Francisco. And in answer to your next question, the Facebook event organizing the protest can be found here.

Tiptree Results

I’ve just blogged the Tiptree winners over at SF Awards Watch (many thanks to Pat Murphy for the press release). I’m much happier with the result this year. I’ve not actually fully read either of the winners (though I have read some of Nisi’s book and was impressed), but I have heard very good things about both of them. Also the two books I was hoping to see do well, Ekaterina Sedia’s The Alchemy of Stone and Alison Goodman’s The Two Pearls of Wisdom, are both on what looks to be a very strong honor list. I now very much want to read Ali Smith’s Girl Meets Boy. I’m slightly surprised not to see Cycler on the list, but otherwise I can’t think of anything to complain about (yeah, for once, I know…).

Two Quick Apologies

1. To everyone who clicked on Neil’s tweet the minute they saw it, sorry, my web host doesn’t expect that level of business. Hopefully responses are better now.

2. To Kate Bornstein: guilty as charged, I guess. My main concern was to alert people to what was going on, not to highlight every issue. And as Jenny Boylan remarked ironically on Twitter, this was one occasion when LGBT really was inclusive. But, just as Amazon can simply not think about LGB issues when worrying about “adult” content, so T issues tend to get forgotten when people are thinking about LGB issues. The number of trans-related books that got hit was doubtless only a fraction of the 57,000 or so books affected, but those books, and their authors, are no less important.

Changing Sex is Evolutionary Advantage

My but the fundies are going to hate this: sex changes and evolution working together. Well, that’s what the New Haven Independent says anyway. It is from this article about gender-bending fish which says:

Using mathematical modeling they discovered that the ability to change sex is usually at an evolutionary advantage, prompting the question: Why aren’t more animals sex-changers?

The original paper is available online here.

Change Happens: US Backs Gay Rights

Since he took office, Mr. Obama has been quietly undoing many of the more unpleasant policies of his predecessor. There’s still doubtless a long way to go, but here’s one change that has made me happy. According to Associated Press (reported here on Yahoo) the US will now sign a UN resolution calling for an end to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The resolution was put before the UN in December last year, and the USA was the only Western nation to refuse to sign it.

70 UN member countries still outlaw homosexuality, and in several it is punishable by death.

A Lammy for Marcus?

In processing the awards news for SFAW this morning I discovered that my friend Marcus Ewert is up for a Lammy this year for his excellent transgender children’s book, 10,000 Dresses. I am keeping my fingers crossed for him and the artist, Rex Ray.