Today on Ujima – LGBT Rights

Today’s show was a Diversity Special put together for me by my friend Berkeley Wilde of Diversity Trust. With Berkeley in the studio were Sarah-Louise Minter of LGBT Bristol, Lesley Mansell of North Bristol NHS Trust, Mitch McMorrow of Bristol City Council (and Shout Out Radio), and John, a young, black gay man from Bristol.

We covered a lot of territory: legislation, hate crime, services for young people, the 20th birthday of Freedom Youth, services for old people, LGBT celebrities, the need for monitoring, Ireland finally getting legal recognition for trans people (today, well done, TENI!), the plight of LGBT asylum seekers and probably a whole lot more that I have forgotten.

You can find the first hour of the show here, and the second hour here. And by the way if you want to listen to my Pride coverage it is here — sorry about the Dr. Flex billing, the Listen Again system is automated and doesn’t cope well with unusual scheduling, and thanks to the good Doctor for the use of his slot.)

The playlist for today’s show was as follows:

  • Secret Love – The Vinyl Closet
  • Doubt – Kele Okereke
  • It Must Be Love – Labi Siffre
  • Feels Good – Rahsaan Patterson
  • Bleed Like Me – Garbage
  • Q.U.E.E.N. – Janelle Monáe (feat. Erykah Badu)
  • Talking ‘Bout A Revolution – Tracy Chapman
  • I Will Survive – Gloria Gaynor

On next week’s show I’ll be having a chat with a teenage fashion designer, Kieran Mceleny; catching up with friend of the show, Christina Zaba; finding out from Sian Webb why Bristol lags behind in the gender pay gap stakes; and talking to Assistant Mayor Daniella Radice about the 50:50 campaign for female representation in the City Council that was launched today. There may be a bit of feminist ranting.

A Little Trans History

Recently BBC4 showed a history documentary called “Spitfire Women”. It is all about the women pilots who flew for the Air Transport Auxiliary (ATA) during WWII. They were not allowed to fly combat missions, but equally men could not be spared to move planes about the country (specifically from factories to airfields). Women who could fly, including Amy Johnson, persuaded the government to let them help the war effort by getting this job done. Eventually they got to fly Hurricanes and Spitfires.

I was planning to watch this at some point because it sounded like an awesome piece of feminism. There’s no reason why women can’t fly fun aircraft. A Spitfire is even more fun than a pony. Also a bunch of 80-something women talking about being hell raiser pilots in WWII was guaranteed to be fun (and a perfect appetizer for episode 1 of Agent Carter). But then I got email from Juliet McKenna alerting me to the fact that one of these women was actually a man.

Jonathan Ferguson was born in Lurgan in Northern Ireland in 1915. He was assigned female at birth, and named “Irene Joy” by his parents. By the time he got into the ATA he was already open about his gender identity. Judging from the photos here, there were a few lesbians in the service as well as a few girls who enjoyed their sex symbol status. Jonathan apparently didn’t stand out too much, and the one woman who talked about him sounded very supportive.

Jonathan stayed in the RAF after the war, but must have eventually moved to a desk job because when he transitioned socially in 1958 he was described as a government scientist. I haven’t yet found much news about him online, but the story did make the Palm Beach Post, which wryly noted that Jonathan got a pay rise simply for announcing that he was a man, because men got paid more than women in the Civil Service.

When I get time I intend to follow the story up and see if I can find out more. According to the program, Jonathan has died. I’m wondering whether he got to meet Roberta Cowell, because she flew Spitfires in combat (and ended up a PoW). Not that it would be been much fun for him, if her treatment of Michael Dillon is anything to go by, but maybe their shared love of planes would have helped bridge the gap. If anyone out there knows anything about Ferguson, please get in touch.

Brief Pride Follow-Up

It occurs to me that I forgot to mention which songs I played during my hour covering Bristol Pride. They were:

  • I Am What I Am – Amanda Lear
  • Diva – Dana International
  • True Trans Soul Rebel – Against Me!

One of these days we’ll have trans artists on stage at the event (other than drag queens, which we have a-plenty).

Another Year, Another Pride

July is a very busy time of year. It is the usual time for Finncon; the last weekend of the month is reserved for Trans Pride in Brighton; but the second weekend is a bit crazy. It sounds like there was a really great little convention happening in Derby. Manchester’s Sparkle looks like it is turning into a really great trans event. My first priority, however, was Bristol Pride.

I must admit that the clash with Sparkle makes it a very difficult choice for me. Bristol Pride’s organizers are very supportive of trans folks. In particular Jayne Graham-Cummings has put together some great trans-themed programming for the Queer Vision film festival, and I’m seriously bummed not to have been able to see any of it. Trans presence at Pride itself is another matter. There are a couple of trans stalls, and a great number of people saying LGBT when they mean LG. Lots of trans people attend, not many actually do anything.

Part of this is due to the success of the event. I interviewed Daryn Carter on the radio during the afternoon and he said that at the time the venue was operating a strict one-in-one-out policy because it was near to capacity. By no means all of those people were LGBT-identified. Pride is, after all, a very good deal as far as a day out goes. If you keep it cheap so that underprivileged folk (like trans people) can attend then inevitably lots of other people will tale advantage. I confess that one of the reasons I spend my time in the Shout Out mobile studio is that if I’m behind a stall I would have to put up with being stared at all day, and occasionally “complimented” on how “convincing” I look. Being a zoo animal is no fun.

On the other hand, doing radio is great fun. I had a great day.

I’ve spent a lot of time with fairly famous writers, all of whom are lovely people. Pop stars are another breed entirely. Some of them have minders to protect them. Blue played Pride a couple of years ago, and were basically whisked in and whisked out again. This year’s lineup was much more friendly.

The star of the show was Heather Small (formerly of M People and also ex-wife of Welsh rugby’s defense coach, Shaun Edwards). She turned up to do a sound check early in the morning, noticed the radio studio, and did an impromptu live interview there and then. That’s pretty much unheard of. She did a post-gig interview as well.

Another star act was a group featuring Cheryl Baker, Mike Nolan and Jay Ashton, three of the original members of Bucks Fizz. There’s no space here to go into the complicated legal dispute over the name, but with the aid of new recruit Bobby McVay they do a remarkably convincing impression of themselves. You might almost think you were listening to the original band. Not only that, but they did a wonderful medley of 80s pop hits that had everyone up and dancing. And yes, they still do the skirt thing. Allegedly is it in the contract.

I was backstage during their gig, but wasn’t on air at the time so didn’t get to participate in the interview. Photos were taken, and at some point you may get to see the group one which includes me trying not to look too stupidly happy about being stood next to Cheryl Baker. That woman still has one of the best smiles in show business. Here’s hoping some of that glory make me look not too bad.

The band stayed around for ages, talking to fans and the show organizers. They seemed to be lovely people. As indeed were all of the acts I met.

The day’s coverage was organized by Shout Out (with sponsorship from the Queen’s Shilling nightclub). Many thanks to Mary Milton and the rest of the crew for doing such a great job and allowing me to be involved. Ujima took the live feed between 6:00pm and 8:00pm, and for the first hour the show was hosted by me, Tommy Popcorn and Jasmine.

Hosting the show is challenging. You can’t quite be sure in advance how much of a show you’ll need to do. Much of the time you simply take the live feed from the main stage. That’s especially the case with someone like former X-Factor star, Amelia Lily, who got through her set very efficiently. Sometimes, however, there is a break between acts, or you get an artist who feels the need to engage in banter with the audience between every song, and then you have to cover. Plus you get to interview people as they come off stage.

My interview ended up being with Tina Cousins, whom I knew very little about in advance. Thankfully I had Andy Thomas running the desk for me, and he happens to be a huge fan of Tina’s. Also I did my research, and we ended up conducting the interview partly in English, partly in Australian and partly in Finnish. Thanks for being so easy to interview, Tina, and best of luck with the acting debut.

From my point of view, the main attraction of the day was Helen Marnie, formerly of Ladytron, whose work I love dearly. Witching Hour is a favorite album of mine. The band is currently on hiatus and Helen has a new project called Marnie, which is actually a band because while Helen handles lead vocals and some keyboards there’s also a lead keyboard / back-up vocals performer, and an actual, non-electronic drummer. The new album, Crystal World, was produced in Reykjavik, and I wish I had been in on the interview as I would have asked if K.K. had been involved in any way (any excuse to mention Sense8).

Anyway, I’ve bought the album. It is less poppy than a Ladytron album, but that might mean I end up playing it more while I am working.

Running a live stage at Pride is clearly an interesting challenge. Most of the acts were vocalists who sang over backing tracks. The reason for that is that a real band needs to set up their instruments. Marnie were late starting because you can’t get a real band up and running as quickly as a vocalist. Personally I love hearing musicians play their instruments, but I quite understand the temptation to move people on and off quickly.

Anyway, it was a lovely, if very tiring day. My thanks to everyone, especially the Shout Out crew, and Tommy & Jasmine. Thanks also to Kym Mazelle, Tina Cousins, Amelia Lily, La Voix, Not Quite Bucks Fizz and Marnie who were all awesome. Special thanks to Brighton’s Boogaloo Stu for being a wonderful host for the stage. And of course to Daryn Carter and the Pride team for all of their hard work.

Hello Mozambique

Every so often my academic friends tweet about interesting books and papers. I got one this morning (thanks Olivette!). The book in question is Sexuality and Gender Politics in Mozambique: Rethinking Gender in Africa by Signe Arnfred, who I think is Danish. There is a review of the book at Feminist Review, and what caught my eye was this comment:

Arnfred argues that in the same way that race, a ‘social, political, economic relation of domination, is reinvented as a biological difference, thus naturalized, [w]hat happens to “gender” is very similar: a social relation of male domination/female subordination, brought along with the European colonial powers and supported by Christianity, is represented as a biological difference between men and women, with the “natural” implication, that women are subordinated in relation to men’ (pp. 185–186).

This is very similar to the argument I have made about the erasure of trans people from non-European cultures. Obviously with trans folk there may be some biology involved, but the simplistic and incorrect understanding of that science by Victorian-era Europeans is what caused the problem.

So, another book I need to read. I do wish that academic books were not so expensive.

Women’s Outlook Pride Special

Today I did a Pride Special on Women’s Outlook. We began with Roz Kaveney who did a great reading at Hydra Books last night. On the show I asked Roz a few questions about Tiny Pieces of Skull, got her to read some poetry, and asked her a few things about the Rhapsody of Blood series.

Next on the show was Sister Ann Tici Pation of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. The Sisters are looking to set up a chapter in Bristol which will be a very fine and wonderful thing. I’m looking forward to seeing them, especially my good friend Brother Bimbo, at Pride on Saturday. If you are in Bristol and fancy getting involved, do pop along to the Volunteer Tavern on Friday from 1:00pm. They will apparently be there all evening, though I suspect that a certain amount of beer may have been consumed by late in the day.

You can listen to the first hour of the show here.

The second hour begins with my talking to Daryn Carter, the Director of Bristol Pride. There is one heck of a lot going on in Bristol this week. Sadly the FGW train strike makes it very difficult for me to do anything before Saturday. I just got out in time today. Not that I’m going to complain, because the RMT guys are striking to defend the existence of food and drink services on London trains. Apparently the management want to make them driver-only.

Anyway, there’s theatre tonight, comedy tomorrow, a big party thing possibly involving fishnet-wearing transylvanians on Friday night, a massive all-day party in the park on Saturday, and some trans-themed film programming at Watershed on Sunday. Phew!

Finally I was joined by Jeff Evans of Schools Out who is in charge of the National Festival of LGBT History. We talked a bit about Jeff’s own academic interests, and then looked at some of the exciting things that will be happening in Bristol next February.

Hour two had a couple of little technical glitches. One was because I listed the songs in the wrong sequence on the running order, so my apologies to Eric and Isaac for that. The other was because the studio wifi went down briefly, causing us to have no access to the ads when we needed to play them. Thankfully it came back up in time for us to play the missing ads in the next segment.

You can listen to the second hour here.

The playlist for the day was a combination of LGBT-themed music and artists who will be appearing on the main stage at Pride.

  • Diana Ross – I’m Coming Out
  • Sylvester – You Make Me Feel (Mighty Real)
  • M People – Moving on Up
  • Ladytron – Sugar
  • Little Richard – Good Golly Miss Molly
  • Vinyl Closet – Garbage Man
  • Tracy Chapman – Baby Can I Hold You?
  • Noah Stewart – I Have A Dream

By the way, Roz tells me that the woman on whom Natasha in Tiny Pieces of Skull was based knew Sylvester very well. Small world.

Queering Archipelacon

I’ll leave Suzanne to talk about her YA panel as she can do so far more authoritatively than I can.

The LGBT panel was packed out again. There were a few vacant seats, but there were also people sitting on the stairs so I think we can claim that we maxed out. My thanks to Dirk and Suzanne for an excellent discussion. As promised, I have posted the reading list to this blog. To read it as a PDF, click here.

Tomorrow we have the Pride Picnic for those of us who are missing Helsinki Pride. On Sunday we have my LGBT Superheroes panel, Dirk’s Queering Star Trek panel, and my academic paper on Sandman: A Game of You.

Gender and Spirituality Workshop

I spent Friday in Exeter at an event billed as a Variant Sex and Gender, Religion and Wellbeing Workshop. It was run primarily by academics who study intersex people, but there was plenty of trans involvement as well. The event was hosted by Exeter University’s Centre for Ethics and Practical Theology. I do like the sound of “practical theology”. More on that later.

Obviously most of the people involved were Christians. There was one Buddhist and one Jew amongst the speakers. Some of the audience may have had other religious allegiances, but I don’t recall anyone other than me mentioning that.

The day opened with a presentation online from Dr. Stephen Kerry of Charles Darwin University in Darwin, Australia, who identifies as genderqueer. His paper was mainly about the difficulties of engaging the intersex community, though he talked a bit about Buddhism as well. More on that later. He also confessed to being a science fiction fan, so I guess he and I will be talking a lot in future.

Next up was the Reverend Dr. Christina (Tina) Beardsley who is a trans woman and head of the Multifaith Chaplaincy at Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Trust. She talked mainly about how evangelicals have poisoned the Church of England’s attitude towards trans people, and her hopes for improvement.

After an excellent lunch, we were treated to a superb presentation on being a religious transgender Jew from Max Zachs (whom some of you may remember from My Transsexual Summer). Max was really good. More on that in a little while too.

Finally Maria Morris, the Clinical Team Leader from The Laurels, Exeter’s Gender Identity Clinic, gave the cis folks in the audience an update on the current state of treatment protocols. I knew all of that anyway, but it was so good to see it officially confirmed. The treatment of trans people by the NHS has come a very long way since I transitioned.

So what was the importance of this event? Obviously I have an historical interest in the involvement of trans people in religion, but the key is in that term “practical theology”. Whether you like it or not, large numbers of human beings have religious beliefs. Most of them belong to faiths that are currently strongly transphobic. While I was at the conference, my Twitter feed lit up with discussion of the latest pronouncements on trans folk by the Pope. There’s some push back from devout Catholics that he’s being misrepresented (he does, after all, only issue pronouncements in Latin), but it is still very worrying. Given this, I think it is absolutely essential for trans activists to engage with people of faith. There are those who support us, and from a practical point of view I think we are far more likely to convert some to our cause than we are to end religion.

Also, as Tina pointed out, trans people are often in need of a great deal of emotional support. If they are religious themselves, and can get help from supportive people with spiritual authority, that has to be a good thing. Sadly they are unlikely to get it from anyone else. One of the points that Max made in their presentation was that their left-wing friends had provided no support for Max’s attempts to become a rabbi, partly because many of them felt that all religion was the enemy, and partly because some were anti-Jewish on principle.

The reason I loved Max’s presentation so much is that they made such a good argument for using theology to make the case for trans people. They started off by emphasizing the importance of ritual and tradition in Judaism, and noting that the penalty for desecrating Shabbat is death. Nevertheless, Judaism exists in the real world, and rules adopted thousands of years ago may not work so well these days. Max noted that there are now many exceptions to the rules for Shabbat that allow Jews to do things like phone an ambulance if a family member has a heart attack. The point is that theological arguments can and have been made to change religious laws, and trans Jews have been busily working away to make their faith more welcoming to gender variant people.

This, by the way, is not new. Max provided examples from the Talmud giving advice to mothers of obviously intersex children. We’ve been discussing other things about the original Hebrew version of the Old Testament as well. Some of this may find its way into my history talks.

Stephen’s comments on Buddhism highlighted the importance of context and translation when discussing historical attitudes towards gender variant people. Some Buddhist texts contain prohibitions against “hermaphrodites”. As someone who studies intersex people, Stephen is naturally concerned about this. However, he’s aware that the word “hermaphrodites” may have been used to mean something quite different. My research suggests that, prior to the 19th Century, it could be used to mean trans people, and even gay people. In a Buddhist context, any prohibitions could be a response to the widespread use of eunuchs in China and Vietnam, or it could be in reaction to Hindu faith groups that were accepting of trans people.

Finally I want to talk a bit about the term “intersex”. As I noted earlier, several of the academics at the conference (including Stephen Kerry) study intersex people. There was some debate as to the acceptability of intersex as a term. I’m not intersex-identified myself, so it is very important to me to use terms acceptable to the intersex community when I’m talking abut them.

Given that I keep using “intersex”, you will have guessed that I think it is still the preferred term. That’s because activist organizations such as UKIA and OII use it. Nevertheless, Stephen and his colleagues are being told that the term is offensive. The alternative term is DSD. That normally stands for Disorders of Sexual Development, and I know that any mention of “disorder” tends to be greeted with fury by activists. Some people apparently claim that the first D stands for “differences”. That sounds a little weasely to me, but I am open to being corrected by intersex activists.

Having made a few inquiries, it appears that the people pushing for the use of DSD rather than intersex are medical professionals and support groups run by the parents of intersex children.

Sense8 – Final Thoughts

I have now watched all 12 episodes of Sense8, and overall it is getting a strong thumbs up from me. Of course I am very much part of the target audience. So let’s try to break things down a bit.

I’ve seen a number of people online complaining about lack of plot, or the confusing nature of the early episodes. It is worth spending a bit of time talking about the structure of the series.

Some TV series are entirely episodic. The original Star Trek series, for example, had almost nothing of a connecting theme beyond being Wagon Train in space. The modern fashion is for story arcs, and some series have a very strong one. Sense8 does not. There is certainly a long-term plot concerning the sensates and the evil Mr. Whispers, but that isn’t close to being resolved in this series. There are no distinct plots for individual episodes either.

What we get instead are story arcs for individual members of the sensate cluster we are following. Sometimes they interact. Will and Nomi are crucial to the story arc for Riley. Other times the characters pretty much solve their own issues. Kala and Lito briefly turn up to help Wolfgang with specific tasks, but mostly he’s on his own. Some character story arcs are still unfinished at the end of the series.

Obviously if you are someone who needs a tight plot and a satisfying ending then Sense8 is likely to disappoint you. I’m rather more interested in it from the show-runner point of view. It is nicely open-ended, and yet still has multiple interesting story arcs. It is also very much character-focused. Compare that to shows like Star Trek, and even Babylon 5, where characters mostly existed to serve the plot, and only developed when it was their turn to take point on an episode.

What about the science fiction content of the series? Well, there are no invading aliens, no rebellious robots, no rampaging dinosaurs. If you were hoping for those things you’ll be disappointed. Sense8 is very much about humanity: two species thereof. It is, if you like, a story about mutants, except that the only super power that each sensate has is the ability to communicate with, and share skills with, other members of their cluster.

So, for example, if someone needs fighting skills then Sun can turn up and do her martial arts magic. If someone needs computer skills then Nomi is on hand. Capheus is a brilliant driver, Lito lies smoothly, and eventually Kala got to show off her scientific knowledge. The cluster is, in effect, a group of 8 people pooling some extraordinary but not supernatural talents in a single being.

Except they are not a single being. Some of the write-ups of the series say that the members of the cluster are all the same person. Certainly they are all born at the same time, but they are all very much individuals. Wolfgang, by his own admission, is a monster. Nomi has criminal tendencies, though she’s doing it for what she believes are good reasons. Capheus has a strong moral sense, while Lito is something of a coward. As with their skills, the cluster embodies many different aspects of humanity.

That, of course, is part of the diversity theme of the series. The characters represent seven different nationalities, half of them people of color. They include a gay man and a lesbian trans woman. It would not surprise me to discover that Sun is asexual. Their careers include a cop, a banker, an actor, a chemist, a bus driver and a DJ. The whole point is that they gather together diverse aspects of humanity.

In episode #9 Jonas makes a short speech that I think is key to the entire series. He tells Will that a key difference between sensates and humans is that sensates have the ability to share experiences and emotions with their rest of their cluster. Humans, being isolated individuals, lack that basic empathic ability, and as a result are pathological and dangerous. It is a very Hippy way of looking at the world. I’m sure that Amanita’s mom would appreciate it. Being of a similar age, I do too. How well it will go down outside of California is another matter.

In addition, of course, we have the LGBT content. As I noted above, the cast contains a gay man and a lesbian trans woman. I’m not in a position to pass judgement on the former (see Matt Cheney for that), but the treatment of the latter is exemplary. Lana Wachowski (I’m assuming she’s responsible for those parts of the script) has managed to include some of the awful ways in which trans people are treated with making Nomi an important part of the plot for reasons that are nothing to do with her being trans. Plus she has cast a trans woman in the role. Jamie Clayton does a good job with the part. It is hard to see how it could have been much better.

There’s also something about the way that Nomi is portrayed that I hadn’t spotted until I read this interview with Jamie at After Ellen. She notes that the relationship between Nomi and Amanita is the most stable and functional one in the series. All of the other characters have relationship problems of some sort, or no relationship. The cute, loveable couple that everyone ends up rooting for are two lesbians: a trans woman and a woman of color.

As I have noted before, some of the other aspects of diversity in the show have been less well handled. That’s almost inevitable. The whole point of doing diversity is that you include as many different aspects of humanity as possible. The chances of the script writing team being as familiar with all of those as one of them is with trans issues are pretty much nil. When you are judging a highly diverse show like this, you do need to be aware that it won’t get everything right. I absolutely accept that some people in, for example, India and Kenya, might entirely understandably be annoyed at how their people are represented. I expect them to understand that I’m delighted at how my people have been represented. Overall, it is far better that the program tried to do all of these things than it did not try.

Claire Light has written a very interesting review of the series in which she points out that by recruiting a far more diverse production team — scriptwriters, directors and so on — the Wachowskis could have got a far better handle on the non-US aspects of the story. Like her, I hope they do better in subsequent series. I suspect that there is pressure on them to not make the series too hard to relate to for a US audience. The show has an essentially white American worldview because it is intended primarily to sell to white Americans. It takes bravery to move away from that, but some significant steps have been taken.

Sadly, I don’t expect the show to be terribly well received. As we have seen with the Puppies, any attempt to add diversity to what has previously been a straight white male preserve is seen as threatening by some. Equally others will say that they are just not interested in the stories of Korean bankers, Mexican actors, or trans people.

To understand how easily this sort of thing happens I recommend that you check out this blog post by Foz Meadows which demonstrates fairly clearly that the plots of The Matrix and Jupiter Ascending are more or less identical, and are equally wildly implausible. The two films diverge in that one is cyberpunk and the other space opera, but that doesn’t make a lot of difference. The major difference between them is that they are gender-swapped. In The Matrix the central character is male, and his concerns are male; in Jupiter Ascending the central character is female, and her concerns are female. As a consequence, The Matrix is held up as a classic of science fiction cinema, while Jupiter Ascending has been almost universally panned.

That, dear readers, is how sexist assumptions about fiction work. Those assumptions will affect Sense8 too. So while I accept that there are some very dodgy things in it, I still love it.

I understand that four series are planned. I’m very much looking forward to the next one.

Trans Studies Now – The Conference

The purpose of my trip to Brighton was to attend an academic conference at the University of Sussex. The title of the conference was Trans Studies Now, and the objective, fairly obviously, was to present the very latest in trans studies across a range of disciplines.

Roz Kaveney was one of the keynote speakers, and she opened up the conference with a talk about her work. That included a reading from Tiny Pieces of Skull, some of her own poetry, including her Inanna poem, and a poem by Catullus that she has translated.

The Catullus poem is about Attis, the consort of the Goddess Cybele who, myth has it, castrated himself for the love of the Goddess. This is usually presented to modern readers as being the result of a fit of madness — being unable to possess the Goddess, Attis choses to castrate himself rather than have any other woman, or he’s driven mad by her beauty, anything but the actual reason. Catullus, Roz notes, make it very clear that Attis wanted to become a woman. He is, of course, the archetype of the Galli — the castrati priestesses of Cybele whom I mentioned in my trans history talk. I’ll be having a lot more to say about them in future.

For now let’s just note that Catullus also involves lions in the story. Lions are, of course, sacred to Ishtar/Inanna, and Cybele’s cult originated in Syria, which is not that far from Mesopotamia.

My paper was due up on the first session after Roz’s talk. I was paired with a Californian trans-male poet, Jonathan Bay, who is now based in Edinburgh, and with my new friend Emma Hutson with whom Roz and I had had dinner the night before.

Jonathan’s poetry centered on trans issues. I particularly enjoyed the one about his nervousness about going through US immigration (even as a citizen, as a trans person it is scary), and the one about his transphobic uncle who moved to Montana rather than live close to Jonathan.

Emma gave a really good paper about the “standard narrative” of being trans, and how one size definitely does not fit all. She clearly has a very good understanding of complicated historical narratives such the rise of transgenderism and the split in the trans community it engendered. For a first time giving a paper at a conference it was very impressive. (Believe me, I have heard a lot of bad papers, especially at ICFA.)

The audience listened quietly to my paper and seemed to have enjoyed it. Only Roz was sufficiently well-versed in SF to ask in-depth questions, and she’s heard most of the content before, so I didn’t really have much to deal with. In the absence of questions, I offered to give them an example of trans-themed SF. A few of you will know what I mean when I say I read “Goldilocks” for them, and that appeared to go down well too. My paper is available from Academia.edu.

After lunch we had the second keynote speech, which was by Katherine Johnson. She’s been in trans studies for a long time, and gave a fine overview of the history of the field, and where it is now.

The afternoon paper session that I attended featured three presenters from outside of the UK. Olivia Fiorilli is from Portugal, and gave a very nice summary of the state of trans pathology in a variety of European countries. Olivia correctly identified a growing trend towards depatholgisation of the condition, and democratisation of treatment. As I said to her afterwards, it is rather ironic that the roadblocks that gender specialists deliberately put into the pathway with the intention of weeding out “unsuitable” candidates for transition have ended up encouraging people to find ways around the standard treatment pathway, which in turn has caused the gender specialists to adjust their protocols in an attempt to retain control of the process.

Next up was Olga Lidia Saavedra Montes de Oca who is from Cuba. This was a really fascinating paper. Under the old Communist regime gender roles were strictly enforced. Adopting proper gendered performance was seen as being evidence of being a good Revolutionary. Of course trans people existed in Cuba, just as they do in every other country. Typically they would leave home so as not to cause embarrassment to their families. Now that there has been philosophical change in the government, many of these trans people are being welcomed back home, because for Cubans family ties are apparently paramount.

Finally we had Sabah Choudrey, who is one of the founders of Trans Pride and also a Muslim. He gave an excellent presentation about how trans people of color are excluded from trans narratives and trans activism. In the UK that generally means actual exclusion. In the US, where there are greater numbers of TPoC, it generally means separatism — there are white trans activists who are the ones who have a chance of getting the ear of the government and access to what little funding is available; and there are TPoC activists who have to do everything for themselves but seem to get a lot more done.

The final session was a film about trans life in Turkey, but by that time I had been off email for over 24 hours so I took time out to check email. I gather that the film was quite distressing.

Overall it was a very interesting day. I met lots of good people, and I hope that Sally Munt and her team as Sussex do this again.

Tomorrow, In Brighton

Have A Word


Tomorrow I am off to Brighton, primarily to talk about science fiction at an academic conference. However, I have discovered that there is a spoken word event on at the Jubilee Library tomorrow evening. As you can see, there’s a stellar line-up. And now there will be me too, and hopefully Roz Kaveney as she’ll be in town as well. It will be transtastic. Do come along if you are in town.

History Month 2016 Reminder

LGBT History Month 2016 flier


Oh look, we have a flier!

And of course I’m posting it here to remind you that we are looking for people to do presentations throughout LGBT History Month next year. I will have some say in what gets put on in Bristol. I am particularly looking for proposals from people of color, bisexuals, trans people, and anyone who falls within LGBT+ but feels excluded by just LGBT. We want all of your histories to be represented.

And the link to find out more from the flier is: http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/national-festival/.

The #MyVanityFairCover Thing

Cheryl's Vanity Fair Cover


For those of you not on Twitter (or not plugged into the trans subset of tweets), this hashtag is a response to the Caitlyn Jenner cover. The idea is that all trans people deserve a shot on the cover of Vanity Fair. I figured that if they were going to put me on the cover then they’d do so for a reason. My thanks for Tom Becker for the photo, and to Crystal Fraiser and Jenn Dolari for starting the hashtag and making the template.

Sense8 : First Thoughts

Nomi and Amanita


Thus far I have watched the first three episodes of Sense8. I thought I should offer a few views on it because I’m seeing people who have given up on episode 1.

I think the criticisms of the lack of story are fair. The series follows 8 major characters, and introducing them all over the space of a one-hour program is hard work. Many TV series take a while to get going, and this one maybe takes longer than most. Even after three episodes, some of the character arcs haven’t really got started. I’m keeping watching for other reasons.

What makes the series interesting, however, is that it is a genuine attempt to introduce a bit of diversity. We have characters from Mexico, India, South Korea and Kenya. The London-based character is Icelandic, and the Berlin-based character is Russian. We have a gay man, and a trans woman. This diversity is both a strength and a weakness.

Much of the weakness derives from the fact that this is not just anyone doing diversity, this is a bunch of rich Californians doing diversity. Much as I love California, certain amount of cluelessness is inevitable. Also there’s that whole thing that I talked about yesterday about having to present diversity to a non-diverse audience in a way that they will find acceptable. That can mean using clichés. Watching the India segments of episode 1 gave me a horrible, sinking feeling. That was confirmed when Samit Basu tweeted this:

And then they doubled down by putting a Bollywood dance number in another episode.

Head * Desk * Repeat

I haven’t seen any comment from Korean, Mexican or Kenyan viewers, but my gut feeling is that the level of stereotyping is getting close to the India segments for some of them. I’ve also seen African Americans expressing disgust with some of the Chicago material.

I do think that this is mostly a result of cluelessness, and lack of knowledge, on behalf of the writers. I say that because they also have a minority character with whom one of the writers has a fair amount of personal connection. There is Nomi Marks who is a trans woman, and in my humble opinion she’s awesome (at least so far).

Part of this, I will admit, is because of Freema Agyeman who plays Amanita, Nomi’s girlfriend. She’s the sexiest thing in Hollywood by far at the moment. If anyone could persuade me to become it lesbian it would be her. Especially if she brings… (whoops, TMI). She’s also a great actress, and Amanita is gloriously fierce. But most of it is because of the issues that get covered in the script.

A lot of you won’t have noticed much of what has gone on. For example, the scene where a TERF1 accuses Nomi of being a “colonizing male” and Amanita steps up in support is fairly short. You probably got that the TERF said something bad, but not what she said, or that she was a TERF.

Then there’s the scene where Nomi and Amanita are given pot brownies by a couple of Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence at the Palace of Fine Arts in San Francisco. Those are two actual Sisters playing at being fairies. I’m not sure which ones — Feòrag probably knows.

We also get a scene at an interpretive dance performance being staged as part of San Francisco Pride. This is The Missing Generation, an extremely powerful piece about AIDS staged by Fresh Meat Productions. The Artistic Director of Fresh Meat is Sean Dorsey, who is trans. Sean has a cameo in Sense8 in a scene with Nomi, Shawna Virago, a queer musician, and Jamison Green, a trans activist2.

In episode 2 we get introduced to Nomi’s horribly transphobic parents. Without giving away too much, Nomi’s story arc is turning into a tale of forced de-transition. It isn’t something that happens a lot, but it is something that absolutely terrifies trans people. Mostly transphobic families can’t do anything awful to us until we are dead, but if they can get us sectioned there’s no limit to the cruelty that they can inflict. Lana Wachowski has apparently said that parts of Nomi’s story are autobiographical. I do hope for her sake this isn’t one of them.

I’m sure that not all trans people will be happy with Nomi as a character, but as far as I’m concerned between them Lana and actress Jamie Clayton are doing a wonderful job. Nomi is somewhat lacking in agency at the moment, but the script wouldn’t have trailed her hacking skills if she wasn’t going to get to use them at some point. I’m pretty sure that she’s going to be absolutely key to the resolution of the plot.

And that, people, is freaking amazing. We have a science fiction TV series with a trans woman as a major character. The plot does address trans issues, but they are real issues that trans people face, not using transition as a plot device.

There are a couple of things worth highlighting here. The first is that Lana knows trans issues well and is therefore able to represent them well. The show’s creative team clearly doesn’t have the same in-depth knowledge of, and sympathy for, the other diverse characters that they are trying to represent. The other is that having a high profile trans character is truly ground-breaking. Having an Indian character is not. Indian people have Bollywood, so there’s no chance of them being impressed by a bunch of Americans including a bunch of horrible stereotypes as representation.

Diversity is hard. We all screw up at some point. With eight differently diverse characters your chances of screwing up are pretty much 100%. But if we are afraid of screwing up then we’ll never make the attempt, so I try not to be too critical. Then again, if the trans content was as clichéd as the Indian content, and if I had lots of other shows with trans characters in them to watch, I’d doubtless be pretty annoyed. I’ll keep watching, because I want to know what happens to Nomi. I quite understand that other people might not want to.


1. For those of you who are not regular readers, TERF stands for Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist — basically a feminist who believes that trans women are men, and probably dangerous sexual fetishists to boot.

2. My thanks to Charlie Jane Anders for connecting me to Sean & Shawna’s work.

Caitlyn Jenner and the Cis Gaze

Watching the trans community’s reaction to Caitlyn Jenner’s high profile transition has been interesting. Other well-known trans women such as Laverne Cox, Janet Mock and Paris Lees have all broadly welcomed Jenner. They understand that having someone else to fly the flag, and take the heat, is extremely valuable to all of us. I’ve mostly been happy to go along with that.

Many trans women have pointed out that Jenner’s wealth and privilege have allowed her to transition in a way that is denied to almost all of us. It is hard not to be jealous of her access to top quality surgeons, stylists and photographers, not to mention that car. Others, inevitably, have felt duty bound to try to take her down, because the desire to police other women’s behaviour is by no means confined to New Statesman columnists.

Rather more seriously, some trans women of color have suggested that Jenner’s transition was born from a desire of white, mainstream media to have a trans icon who can replace Laverne Cox and Janet Mock in the public eye. From what I have read I’m convinced that Jenner’s trans identity is genuine. I no more think that she’d transition solely as a publicity stunt than I think that Mike Huckabee would have actually pretended to be trans just to perve at girls in high school. The cost is way too high for someone who isn’t genuinely trans.

Nevertheless, I am sure that Jenner will become the mainstream media’s go-to trans person, partly because she was so well known before transitioning, and partly because she’s white. I hope she’ll make a good job of representing us — all of us — but I fear that she’ll find it hard.

There was something nagging at the back of my mind when I was thinking about this. I have been writing a paper on trans characters in SF for the Trans Studies Now conference. Jenner’s transformation reminded me strongly of John Varley’s book, Steel Beach. It was a classic manly-man becomes girly-girl story.

Now of course such people do exist. A stereotype is always based on some degree of reality. We’ve got Jan Morris who climbed Everest with Hilary & Tensing; we’ve got Kirsten Beck who was a US Navy SEAL. Jenner is rather more girly than them, but then look at the rest of her family.

Nevertheless, the thing that bugs me about Steel Beach is that it is popular with cis people. It is almost as if that is how they want trans people to be; how they think we should be. The reality, it seems, is a bit too complicated, and not nearly as sensational.

On Wednesday I was listening to my interview with Sarah Savage in which we noted that both she and Fox felt under pressure to present their gender in a binary way on My Transsexual Summer. And then on Thursday I was listening to Elif Åžafak and Robert Irwin talking about Western narratives about Islam. Suddenly everything fell into place.

You see, Jenner’s job is to play a fantasy version of herself on TV. I say fantasy version because we all know that “reality” TV shows are heavily scripted, don’t we? For that matter, Jenner’s transition process has also been meticulously planned. Jenner will be making a TV series about her transition. She’ll doubtless guest on other shows as well. She’ll be under pressure to bring in audiences, and to do that she’ll have to present herself in a way that is palatable to cis people, whether she likes it or not.

Jenner has apparently said that she wants to use her high profile to do good for the trans community. I’m sure that she’ll try. How much she’ll be allowed to do so by studio bosses is another matter. What happens when the audience gets bored and she’s seen as just another aging woman?

I wouldn’t want to be in Jenner’s shoes when some smartass executive decides that it is time to run with the regret narrative. I’m pretty sure that, sooner or later, someone will.

Today’s Women’s Outlook Show Links

Well I don’t know about you folks, but I thought that went pretty well.

Kevlin Henney can always be relied upon to do great things with flash fiction, and I was delighted to hear that this year Bristol will be the focus for National Flash Fiction Day. I’m really sorry I can’t go to all of the good stuff that Kevlin has planned, but I will be in Finland so I mustn’t complain. If you want to attend the flash workshop on the 22nd, details of BristolCon Fringe meetings are here. Details of all of the events in Bristol on the 27th are here.

Lucienne Boyce is excellent value on the history, and I was really please that her husband, Gerard, came along and read a bit of the John Clare poem. It sounds so modern in places, and the similarities between the 18th Century landlords fencing in common land, and our present-day politicians selling off the NHS, are quite alarming. You can learn more about Lucienne and her books at her website.

I also managed to get in a brief discussion of the work Nicola Griffith has done recently on women and literary awards.

And you can listen to the first hour of the show here.

Hour two begins with a little discussion of the Caitlyn Jenner story and then dives into the interview with Sarah Savage. Before the ads, Sarah talks about her time on My Transsexual Summer. After the break we move on to discuss Trans Pride and her new book, Are You a Boy or Are You a Girl? I really like the fact that Sarah & Fox have chosen to avoid writing about a trans kid and have instead tackled the issue of gender stereotyping of children. if we can stop people obsessing about gender stereotypes the lives of trans people will become immeasurably easier.

Details of tomorrow night’s event in London with Paris Lees, Peter Tatchell and Owen Jones (amongst others) can be found here.

The final segment was with Kalpna Woolf of 91 Ways, a wonderful project that uses food to promote links between Bristol’s many diverse cultures. I’m always happy to discuss food, especially when that involves looking at cuisines all around the world. I expect to be donating a food memory to the 91 Ways website at some point. It may well be something else from Melbourne.

The Mexican restaurant I talk about is Fuego.

You can listen to the second hour of the show here.

The music on today’s show was as follows:

  • The Story of Beauty – Destiny’s Child
  • Me and Mrs. Jones – Billy Paul
  • Kung Fu Fighting – Carl Douglas
  • The Boxer – Simon & Garfunkel
  • True Trans Soul Rebel – Against Me
  • Get Up, Stand Up – Bob Marley & The Wailers
  • Food for Thought – UB40
  • Living for the City – Stevie Wonder

I know that Against Me isn’t the sort of music that we normally play on Ujima, and to be honest (sorry Laura), they are not really my cup of tea. However, True Trans Soul Rebel is a brilliant pop song. Were it not for the fact that I am completely useless with guitar and cannot sing to save my life, I would love to perform that song. I have been humming it to myself all day.

Oh, and if you listen along you’ll hear mention of something called 50 Voices. I’m appearing in it. So is Kalpna. I’ll have more to say about that in due course.

Congratulations, Chaz!

This year’s Lambda Literary Awards were announced last night. They are for queer writing in all of its forms. One of the categories is for science fiction, fantasy & horror. As Locus reports, the winner for 2015 is my dear friend Chaz Brenchley for his book, Bitter Waters. Congratulations also to Steve Berman of Lethe Press who published the book.

You can find the full list of winners here. There are two trans categories. The fiction category was won by Casey Plett’s A Safe Girl To Love from the very fabulous Topside Press. The non-fiction category was won by Thomas Page McBee’s Man Alive: A True Story of Violence, Forgiveness and Becoming a Man from City Lights/Sister Spit. It must be pretty spectacular as it beat out Janet Mock’s Redefining Realness.

Brand New Princess

Caitlyn Jenner - via Vanity Fair
Nice wheels, love!

Well, thank goodness that’s over.

I’m not a big fan of celebrity culture. I’m not entirely sure what a Kardashian is. But, as a trans woman, I have found the Jenner saga all over my social media feeds for months. Now at last we seem to have some clarity.

Caitlyn Jenner arrived in the world through a cover and big photo spread in Vanity Fair. She looks great, and very content. She can, we hope, look forward to being happy ever after, just like the best fairy tale princesses. I’m really pleased for her.

What her sudden transformation means for the rest of the trans community is less certain. On the one hand, all publicity is good publicity. Jenner is keeping trans issues in the news, and forcing people to confront their thoughts, prejudices and misconceptions about us. If Jenner’s million-plus followers on Twitter translates into more public sympathy for trans people, I’m all for it.

It is important to remember, however, that Jenner’s story is by no means typical. Little more than a month has passed since the confessional ABC interview with Diane Sawyer, in which Jenner was still presenting as male. Now we see her in glamour shots looking a damn sight better than the average 65-year-old woman. This sort of transformation does not, and cannot, happen for everyone.

Jenner’s transition appears to have been very carefully stage-managed, probably with the help of talented PR people. She will also have had access to the best surgery money can buy, and to expert stylists. There may even have been a bit of photoshop involved. I mean, what glamour shoot in magazines isn’t touched up these days?

In reality, gender transition is a long and drawn out process. Even Lana Wachowski, with all of her money, spent a long time out of the public eye while going through it. From start of hormone therapy to final surgery took me five years. That was actually quite quick, because like Jenner I was able to afford private treatment. Those stuck on NHS waiting lists don’t get the same privileged access.

So if you happen to know someone who announces that they will be undergoing gender transition, please don’t expect an overnight transformation. It will take a long time, and they’ll need a lot of support along the way.

They almost certainly won’t come out of it looking like Jenner either. I mean, how many 65-year-old women do you know who look that good? Would I love to be that glamorous? You bet I would! Is it likely to happen without a massive lottery win that I can spend on cosmetic surgery (and an end to my chocolate habit)? Not a hope in hell.

Trans girls who access treatment before puberty stand a very good chance of looking beautiful, and there will always be a few like April Ashley for whom glamour seems effortless. For most of us who have been through the horror of male puberty, however, beauty is seriously hard work.

Nor should it be a requirement. Firstly, no matter what the advertising business tells us, being beautiful is not a pre-requisite of being female. Most of us can and do get on with our lives perfectly well without film star looks. There’s no more reason to require a trans woman to be beautiful than any other woman. Nor does everyone care. Being glamorous clearly appeals to Jenner, and it does to me as well, but I know plenty of women — trans and otherwise — who are perfectly happy with short hair, no makeup, jeans and a t-shirt.

The point about beauty is that it is an optional extra. Some women are lucky enough to get it for free, some are able to buy it, and some don’t particularly want it. Lack of it, however, does not make you any less of a woman. So while I would like to be more beautiful, lack of beauty is a minor issue compared to where I have come from. Being able to live my life as a woman is such an enormous step forward from where I was before that it seems a bit churlish to ask for anything more. Of course I’d take it if I had the opportunity, but I already have something far more valuable, the ability to be me. I suspect that if you asked Caitlyn Jenner she’d say that was more important to her as well.

Tomorrow on Ujima: Flash, Crime, Trans & Food

I have a very busy show lined up for Women’s Outlook tomorrow.

First up from Noon I will be joined by Kevlin Henney who will, of course, be talking about flash fiction. It is that time of year again. In particular Kevlin and I will be discussing a workshop that he’ll be running at the next BristolCon Fringe (which sadly I shall miss because I’ll be on my way to Finland for Archipelacon). And of course Kevlin will have a story or two to read.

Next up is Lucienne Boyce. We’ll be talking about her new historical novel, Bloodie Bones, the launch of which I reported on last month. The book is an historical crime novel set in Somerset during the time of the 18th Century Enclosures. There will be poaching, and bare knuckle boxing, and talk of agricultural workers’ rights.

Also on the show will be an interview that I recorded with Sarah Savage when she was in Bristol on Friday. We talked about her time on My Transsexual Summer, about the founding of Trans Pride, and about her new children’s book, Are You A Boy Or Are You A Girl?, which challenges gender stereotyping.

And finally I will be talking to former BBC executive, Kalpna Woolf about her latest project, 91 Ways. This is part of the Bristol Green Capital initiative. It is based around the idea that there are 91 different languages spoken in Bristol. That’s one heck of a lot of different cuisines. The project aims to:

  • Inspire people to lead more sustainable lives using the power of food to encourage dialogue, shared learning, education and action
  • Help people make better decisions about their food and well-being to improve the health and sustainability of our city
  • Create a modern social history of Bristol through food and be instrumental in encouraging a sustainable way of living across the whole city
  • Help us all to have a better understanding of how Bristol’s communities live and their behaviour, food journeys and how they engage with our city

Yes, of course this is an excuse for me to talk about food. But it is a great project too.

As usual you can stream the show live from the Ujima website, and it will be available via the Listen Again system for several weeks after broadcast.

Brighton Next Week

Advance warning to Brighton people. I will be amongst you next week. There is a conference called Trans Studies Now taking place at the University of Sussex on Friday, June 12th. There will be keynote speeches from important people like Roz Kaveney and Lewis Hancox. And there will be me talking about science fiction and how gender might evolve in the future.

If you want to attend, details are here. And if you can’t go you should be able to follow along on Twitter.

As it is a formal academic conference, my paper will go up on Academia.edu after the event.

And because it starts early in the morning I’ll be in Brighton on the Thursday night. If anyone wants to catch up for dinner and/or a drink in the Marlborough, please let me know.