Oh No, Link Salad

Sorry about this folks, but I do need to get some paid work out of the way before the end of the month. This is in lieu of proper blogging.

Jed Hartman pointed me at the Geek Feminism Blog, and in particular the Where are all the men bloggers? post, which is hilarious.

Justine is absolutely spot on when she says that wannabe writers tend to ask Very Wrong Questions.

Crochety claims that Jules Verne and HG Wells didn’t write science fiction because they didn’t call it “science fiction”, which I think is the stupidest thing I have heard on a very stupid topic for a very long time.

Damien Walter wants to start a Support Our Zines Day, and as he’s planning to donate money to Clarkesworld as part of it I’m certainly in favor, though there are, of course, many other fine zines out there that deserve your support.

Tim Holman has some more fascinating data, this time proving that urban fantasy is keeping the SF&F business afloat.

Choice of Girls’ Names Affects Career

Back when I wrote about the gender balance in SF&F I pointed to a wealth of research showing that many men simply won’t read a book that they think is written by a woman. Often this isn’t a deliberate, conscious action: it is just something they are trained from birth to do by the cultural environment they live in.

Well, it isn’t just SF&F, by a long way. Today Kate Heartfield tweeted about this research which purports to show that male journalists on Twitter have 3 times as many followers as female journalists (the methodology looks a little shoddy, but they may be right anyway).

What got me blogging, however, was this post from Canada about a study that shows that women lawyers with androgynous or male-sounding names do better in their careers that women with obviously female names.

Subconscious gender discrimination runs very, very deep.

Sex, Gender and Sport

I’m a little late on this, but I wanted to say a few words about the unfortunate case of Caster Semenya who has been forced to undergo a gender test after winning the women’s 800m at the current Athletics World Championships.

Despite what most people think, gender is by no means easy to determine. There is no question about Ms. Semenya’s external anatomy. Take her clothes off and almost everyone would identify her as female. Her birth certificate says she is a girl, and she was raised as a girl by her family. Nor is there any suggestion that she has been taking performance-enhancing drugs. Nevertheless, her right to race as a woman has been challenged. Why?

Well, there are a huge number of different medical conditions lumped under the general heading of “intersex”. Some of these are very common (see this Intersex Society of North America web page for some data). And, as this Science of Sport blog post explains, it isn’t a question of whether Ms. Semenya is obviously female, it is a question as to whether she is entirely female.

Except it isn’t. Athletics, like many sports, has developed a policy for dealing with post-operative transsexuals. They recognize that after gender reassignment surgery and a couple of years of hormone treatment your average male-to-female transsexual no longer has the biological advantages of a male and can be allowed to compete as a female.

The same courtesy is apparently not extended to intersex people, even though they may have lived in the same gender all of their lives.

And ultimately it may not be an issue of medicine at all. Monica Roberts points out that the “you’re really a man” charge has been leveled at large numbers of black sportspeople, even when the charge is patently absurd such as with the Williams sisters. The reason appears to be that women of non-white ethnicities don’t always conform easily to Western standards of beauty.

Therein lines the problem for women in sport: if you do well, and people don’t think that you are pretty, then you’ll be accused of being “really a man”. And because of the way that such cases are treated, you’ll be assumed guilty until proven innocent, even though the nature of the tests that can prove you innocent are controversial.

This is not the first case of this type. A couple of years ago an Indian athlete, Santhi Soundarajan, was stripped of a medal in the Asian games after allegedly failing a “gender test”. As far as I can make out, the results of that test have never been made public, and most explanations I have seen suggest that Ms. Soundarajan’s condition was perfectly legal under the IAAF rules. Nevertheless Ms. Soundarajan was hounded out of athletics and later attempted suicide. The good news is that she has since turned to coaching, at which she is apparently very successful.

Update: Here’s Germaine Greer making a complete idiot of herself in the notoriously transphobic Guardian. Someone might have checked current sporting regulations before publishing that piece, but I guess the Grauniad was too keen to get on with its favorite sport of Tranny-bashing to worry about facts.

LGBT Advocacy in Spec Fic

Via Hal Duncan (on Twitter) I have just discovered The Outer Alliance, a new group dedicated to intelligent discussion of LGBT issues in speculative literature. Here’s the mission statement and pledge.

  • The Outer Alliance is a group of SF/F writers and friends dedicated to LGBT advocacy through education, support, and celebration.
  • As a member of the Outer Alliance I pledge to uphold the tenets of education, support, and celebration of LGBT contributions to the science-fiction and fantasy genres through my actions and work, online and in print.

Naturally I have asked to join. Equally naturally I will be keeping an eye on them to make sure that this is an LGBT group and not an LGb(t) group.

And y’all should sign up too.

The Turing Campaign

A campaign has been launched in the UK to obtain a posthumous apology for computer pioneer, Alan Turing, for his conviction for homosexuality that ended his career and probably led to his suicide at the age of 41. Turing was one of the most brilliant pioneer computer scientists and a key part of the code-breaking team at Bletchley Park that helped crack secret enemy communications during WWII. He received an OBE for his war work, but was later prosecuted for “gross indecency” simply for having sex with a man.

There is an article about the campaign in the Manchester Evening News. If you are a British citizen you can sign the petition over at the 10 Downing Street web site.

It has been pointed out to me elsewhere that many other people (notably Oscar Wilde) also suffered significantly as a result of the UK’s sexuality laws, and they deserve apologies too. Turing, however, is an excellent poster child for such a campaign and an apology to him will effectively be an acknowledgment by the UK government that it has acted very badly in the past.

Those Feminists Are Plotting Again

Checking through my blogs this morning I noticed a post on Feminist SF that suggested introducing a motion to the Business Meeting that would require all Hugo Award nominees to be women for one year. That, I am sure, would have been kicked out very quickly, but it got me thinking about how we might actually get the Hugos to take more notice of women. In the shower I had a bright idea, and that has since been refined (thank you Tim Illingworth) as follows:

Moved, to amend the WSFS Constitution by inserting the following into the end of Section 3.8:

3.8.n If in the written fiction categories, no selected nominee has a female author or co-author, the highest nominee with a female author or co-author shall also be listed, provided that the nominee would appear on the list required by Section 3.11.4.

Section 3.11.4 is the one which specifies that the top 15 nominees plus whoever gets at least 5% of the vote, must be published within 90 days of the Worldcon.

There are two important things about this idea. Firstly no one loses their nomination as a result. If a ballot contained five men, they would all still get their nominations; they would just be joined by a woman. Secondly we don’t pick just anyone – the female nominee has to be someone who would have been honored anyway by being put on the “runner up” list.

There are, of course, many open questions, the most obvious of which is whether it is the job of the Hugos to provide positive discrimination in this way. I don’t expect it to pass. However, I do think that raising the issue for debate will be useful, and I will be fascinated to see what sort of response the motion gets.

Many thanks to Yonmei for having the idea of doing something in the first place.

International Blog Against Racism Week

Apparently this week is International Blog Against Racism Week. Given that we have Worldcon coming up in just a few days, I’m not going to produce anything spectacular, but I would like to point you at a couple of interesting posts.

Firstly Mary Robinette Kowal nails it with respect to the question of “how does race affect white people?”

And secondly a guest blogger over at Justine’s asks us to read outside of our comfort zone – something I have always been in favor of.

Talking of which, my reading this morning with regard to the Not the Booker Prize initiative turned up something very interested. It is a book called White is for Witching, and while it is marketed as literary fiction it is undeniably horror. The author, Helen Oyeyemi, appears to be one of the rising stars of the LitFic community in the UK. She’s originally from Nigeria but grew up in London. Here’s a review from the New Statesman. The book is available in the US (see Amazon link from cover).

Joined Up Government (Lack Thereof)

Some time ago I signed one of these online petition things asking the UK government whether the proposed ID card scheme would provide protection for transgender people who could be put at risk if their full personal history were made available to anyone doing ID checks. The Government’s response is now available on the 10 Downing Street web site, and it includes this:

As such, when an individual is using an identity card to prove their identity to an employer and a confirmation of their details is requested from the Register, their gender history would not be revealed.

Unfortunately, since that petition was submitted, the Government has published a new “Equality” Bill. The provisions of that bill include granting firms the right to declare any job as unsuitable for transgender people, and making it a criminal offense for a transgender person to fail to disclose his or her status when applying for such a job.

Um, #joinedupgovernmentfail?

Saving Children From Writers

Today’s Independent brings the news that a group of leading UK writers of children’s books will no longer be doing school visits because they object to having to be vetted to prove that they are not paedophiles. Philip Pullman is one of the more prominent authors involved.

This is part of a wider government initiative to insulate the nation’s children from all possible forms of harm, no matter now unlikely. One of the possible side-effects I have seen discussed is that UK conventions will no longer be able to admit children unless all convention staff have been vetted.

Of course, this is all for the good of the children. They have to be protected from bad people. And you can be sure that this legislation is going to get used to bar all sorts of people from working with kids, starting with LGBT folk.

India: Glad to be Gay?

The huge news in the LGBT news today is that a court in Delhi has ruled India’s law on homosexuality unconstitutional. Currently anyone convicted of homosexuality in India can be sentenced to up to 10 years in prison. While convictions are not common, the law does mean that gay people are unlikely to be open about their behavior, and this can cause huge problems with medical issues such as AIDS.

This is not a new development. As The Times of India reported a few days ago, the Indian government had been considering repealing the law, which many see as an unfortunate hangover from colonial times. However, as this Thai newspaper reports, religious leaders from India’s Hindu, Muslim and Christian communities are united in their opposition to any change.

The news from India is important in a wider context because of the vast number of people that live there. As part of the Stonewall commemoration over the weekend Jeff VanderMeer and John Coulthart linked to a chart showing the state of gay rights legislation around the world. I thought at the time that it would be interesting to see the country representations weighted by population (hello, Russell, you there?). Changing the situation in India would make an enormous difference to such a map.

We Stand Up

In this age of Twitter and attention deficiency there is a new fashion for writing short fiction, but Bruce Holland Rogers has been writing very short stories for years. Normally you can only get them on subscription (a remarkably good value of $10/year for 3 stories a month), but this month Bruce has opted to make one story (quite an old one) public. He did so because of the recent events in Iran, but in many ways it is also a very appropriate story to point you at on this, the 40th Anniversary of the Stonewall Riot. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you, “We Stand Up”, by Bruce Holland Rogers.

Equality Swings and Roundabouts

So, the Obama Administration is currently introducing a bill to Congress that will ban employment discrimination against transgender people. Meanwhile the British parliament is merrily giving passage to a so-called “Equality Bill” that will specifically allow employers (and business, and schools) to discriminate against transgender people, thereby flouting European Human Rights legislation and rolling back much of the effect of the 2004 Gender Recognition Act.

Riversend

Sylvia Kelso’s sequel to Amberlight continues in a similar vein of exploring gender issues without providing any pat answers. I don’t expect Riversend to be any more popular with the current crop of feminist fandom than Amberlight was, but I’m still enjoying the series.

Kelso is still busily torturing her characters by any means possible, but manages to justify the various plot twists fairly well. Also either I’m getting used to her style, or she’s got easier to read since the previous book. There are still a lot of passages where the characters talk in nuances and you have to work out what they were conveying to each other, but the prose appears to flow more easily now.

There are, apparently, more books on the way.

I’ve been asked to write something about feminist SF for Tahtivaeltaja and will have more to say about the books in that. You do all read fine Finnish semiprozines, don’t you…

Everyone’s At It

The fundies keep telling us that homosexual behavior is bad because it is “unnatural”. Just how unnatural is it? Well, according to new research from UC Davis, most species of animals exhibit some form of same-sex coupling. Details here.

How Bad Laws Get Written

As some of you will know, there is an “Equality” bill currently progressing through the UK parliament. There are many bad things about the bill, some of which I have written about before, but not all of this is deliberate. Writing laws is hard, especially when you have smart lawyers ready and waiting to pick holes in everything you do.

The really bad stuff is, I think, a result of MPs having been convinced of the need for exceptions in “special cases”. They try to be fair to everyone, but with something like an civil rights the minute you create a special case you drive a coach and horses through the protections you are supposed to be creating, because everyone who wants to carry on discriminatory practices will immediately begin to present what they do in a manner in which, their lawyers can argue, they qualify for the exemption. In the case of this particular bill the loopholes are so loosely written that merely claiming to be prejudiced against trans people gives you the right to discriminate against them.

A really spectacular mistake can be found in the bill’s definition of trans people. It presents two examples, one of a person who has undergone hormone treatment and surgery, and one who merely chooses to live in the opposite gender, does so full time, and is generally accepted by society in that gender. Those are indeed two very common types of trans people (though it doesn’t cover everyone). However, in the first example the person described has transitioned from male to female, whereas in the second example the person has transitioned from female to male. The effect of this, once it gets into the courts, will be that female-to-male trans people are protected in all circumstances, but male-to-female trans people will be protected only if they have had surgery, because lawyers will argue that the examples clearly show that MtFs are held to a more stringent requirement than FtMs.

It is a messy business, making laws, but if you don’t get it right then you can create exactly the opposite effect to what you intended to do.

Why It Matters

Much of the discussion around the blogosphere about the KRXQ shock jock case has focused on freedom of speech. Surely, people argue, Rob Williams and Arnie States have a right to say what they want about transgender people. And of course under current US law they do. The fact that much of the rest of the country is outraged at their ignorant and hateful comments should be punishment enough. But sadly such issues also have wider ramifications. As one commenter here noted, transgender people are 17 times more likely to be murdered than the average US citizen. Other statistics, published by HRC but now a little old, suggest that transgender people living in the US have a 1 in 12 chance of having their lives ended by murder.

In September 2008 the body of a transgender woman, Ruby Molina, was found floating in the American River in Sacramento – part of the area that KRXQ serves. The police identified her death as “suspicious” and offered a $1000 reward for any information that might help them resolve the case. As far as I can see from trawling the Internet this morning, no progress has been made on this. Whoever murdered Ruby Molina has got away with it.

This is by no means an isolated case. Transgender people are murdered on a regular basis all over the USA. Mostly their killers are not brought to justice. Even if they are, they are often let off because juries take the attitude of another commenter: that transgender people are “weirdos and freaks”. If you dehumanize someone in this way, then killing them apparently doesn’t matter.

My search for news about Ruby Molina did bring up this report from the Sacramento News & Review about a memorial service for Ruby and other victims of anti-LGBT violence. The report quotes Dr. Gregory M. Herek, a professor of psychology at UC Davis:

Herek also pointed out that “when individuals perceive that they have some sort of ‘permission’ to attack members of minority groups, they will do so.”

This is what people like Williams and States have in mind when they launch public attacks against people they hate. They know that they may not get away with murdering people themselves, and probably they don’t have the courage to do so. However, they are well aware that by defaming particular groups of people in strident and defamatory tones on the radio they will encourage other people – people who are less smart and less cowardly than themselves – to do the dirty work for them. Because they haven’t explicitly incited murder they know that they can hide behind their freedom of speech rights and avoid any responsibility for what they have said, but they know all too well what the effects of their words will be on others. It is murder by proxy performed by cowards.